Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

NEW 2012 IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | May 23, 2012

The IRS Whistleblower Program: Making Money the Old Fashioned Way!

The IRS Whistleblower Office processes financial awards to people who provide information about the tax indiscretions of others. If the IRS uses information provided by the whistleblower, based on recently finalized Treasury Regulations the whistleblower can receive up to 30 percent of the additional tax, penalty and other amounts collected or refund denied!

Statutory Limitations. There are currently two basis types of whistleblower awards. Pursuant to Code §7623(b), if the taxes, penalties, interest and other amounts in dispute exceed $2 million, and a few other qualifications are met, the IRS will pay 15 percent to 30 percent of the amount collected. If the noncompliant taxpayer is an individual, their annual gross income must exceed $200,000[i]. There is no limit on the dollar amount of the award. A reduced award amount of up to 10% is available in cases based principally on disclosure of specific allegations resulting from: (i) judicial or administrative hearings, (ii) from a governmental report, hearing, audit or investigation, or (iii) from the news media[ii]. The award is reduced if the whistleblower “planned and initiated” the non-compliance and the award is to be denied if the whistleblower is convicted of criminal conduct arising from their role in planning and initiating the non-compliance.[iii] Awards are subject to appeal to the U.S. Tax Court.[iv] 

If the thresholds in Code §7623(b) are not satisfied, Code §7623(a) authorizes, but does not require, the IRS to pay for information relating to violations of the internal revenue law that result in recovery of tax.[v] The maximum award is 15 percent of up to $10 million. In addition, these awards are discretionary and the whistleblower cannot dispute the outcome of the claim in Tax Court. 

Filing a Whistleblower Claim. All whistleblower claims must be submitted under penalty of perjury on Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information whether submitted under Code §7623(b) or Code §7623(a). Form 211 should be mailed to Internal Revenue Service, Whistleblower Office, SE:WO, 1111 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20224. The claim must include a declaration under penalty of perjury stating “I declare, under penalty of perjury, that I have examined this application and my accompanying statement and supporting documentation and aver that such application is true, correct and complete, to the best of my knowledge.” It must also include Explanation of how the information that forms the basis of the claim came to the attention of the claimant, including the date(s) on which this information was acquired, and a complete description of the claimant’s present or former relationship (if any) to the person that is the subject of the claim (e.g., family member, acquaintance, client, employee, accountant, lawyer, bookkeeper, customer). If the claimant identifies multiple person(s) as the subject of a claim, describe his or her relationship to each person.[vi] A whistleblower that wishes to report possible instances of tax fraud by another individual, and does not want an award, should complete IRS Form 3949 A, Information Referral, or provide the information via a letter. 

Evaluating the Whistleblower’s Claim. An analyst in the Whistleblower Office will initially consider the information provided by the whistleblower. Effective January 1, 2012, the Informant Claims Examination Unit (ICE) was realigned from IRS Campus Compliance in the Small Business/Self Employed Operating Division to the Whistleblower Office.  The ICE Unit was the focal point for the IRS informant program prior to the 2006 legislation that created the Whistleblower Office, and continued to manage the process for claims that did not appear to meet the $2 million “amount in dispute” threshold established for the mandatory award program by those amendments.  The Whistleblower Office has worked with Campus Compliance and the ICE Unit to promote consistent treatment of claims, including a requirement that the Director of the Whistleblower Office, currently Steve Whitlock, approve all awards.  Receipt, control, evaluation and award processing are now incorporated in a single organization, streamlining management responsibility and program accountability.  

Claims involving at least $50,000 of unreported income per year are routed to IRS Criminal Investigation (CI) for review.[vii] A threshold requirement for any award Code § 7623 is that the information must lead to judicial or administrative action – an audit or investigation resulting in the collection of proceeds. In the case of a large corporate taxpayer whose returns are audited each year, an administrative action can mean the creation of a new issue under the Audit Plan or a change in the way information about an issue is collected or analyzed, which would not otherwise have occurred without the information provided by the whistleblower. In other cases, an administrative action can mean placing a taxpayer under audit who was not already under audit.

An action is based on the information provided by the whistleblower if the IRS would not have acted but for the receipt of the information from the whistleblower. Action by the IRS may include the initiation of an examination or investigation that would not otherwise have been undertaken, or the modification of a pending or planned examination or investigation as a result of information provided by the whistleblower. All relevant factors, including the value of the information furnished in relation to the facts developed by the investigation of the violation, will be taken into account by the Director in determining whether an award will be paid, and, if so, the amount of the award.[viii] Generally, a related action is (i) any action involving the taxpayer from the original action and that is based on, either directly or indirectly, the same information on which the original action is based, and (ii) in cases in which the information provided identifies a promoter, preparer, or other similar person and describes underpayments of tax or violations of the tax laws by one or more taxpayers that directly relate to the promoter’s activities, any action (involving any taxpayer) that is directly based on the information provided.[ix] 

Processing the Claim. The process, from submission of complete information to the IRS until the proceeds are collected, may five to seven years, and longer when there are protracted appeals or collection actions.[x] The requirement that claims be paid from collected proceeds generally means that payment will not be made until there is a final determination of tax liability (including taxes, penalties, interest, additions to tax and additional amounts) owed to the government and such amounts have been collected by the IRS. A final determination of tax does not occur until the statutory period for filing a claim for refund expires or there is an agreement between the taxpayer and the IRS that there has been a final determination of tax for a specific period and a waiver of the right to file a claim for refund is effective. Therefore, the IRS may not make payments for several years after the whistleblower has filed the claim. 

Common examples of when a final determination of tax liability can be made include, but are not limited to at the administrative level when the IRS and the taxpayer enter into a closing agreement wherein the taxpayer conclusively waives the right to appeal or otherwise challenge a deficiency or additional tax liability determined by the Service; if a taxpayer petitions United States Tax Court; when a decision becomes final within the meaning of Code §7481; and after the expiration of the statutory period for a taxpayer to file a claim for refund and to file a refund suit based on the claim against the Untied States, or if a refund suit is filed, when the judgment in that suit becomes final. A finding of fraud in a tax case carries some significant additional implications for penalties, fines and a possible period of incarceration for the taxpayer. 

“Collected proceeds” are the monies the IRS obtains directly from a taxpayer(s) which are based upon the information the whistleblower has provided. Effective February 22, 2012, Treasury Regulations §301.7623-1 defines “amounts collected and collected proceeds” as including: tax, penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts collected by reason of the information provided; amounts collected prior to receipt of the information if the information provided results in the denial of a claim for refund that otherwise would have been paid; and a reduction of an overpayment credit balance used to satisfy a tax liability incurred because of the information provided. Significantly, the final Treasury Regulations did not a reduction in loss carryforwards resulting in increased future tax liabilities within the term “collected amounts.” Criminal fines, which must be deposited into the Victims of Crime Fund, cannot be used for payment of whistleblower award.[xi] 

A whistleblower award is dependent upon both the initiation of an administrative or judicial action and collection of tax proceeds. If the IRS does not proceed, notwithstanding receipt of information and an otherwise valid claim, there can be no whistleblower award.”[xii] 

Calculating the Amount of the Claim. For claims filed after December 20, 2006 where the amount in dispute exceeds $2 million (and in the case of an individual taxpayer, the taxpayer had gross income exceeding $200,000 for at least one taxable year in question), awards will be paid in proportion to the value of information furnished voluntarily with respect to proceeds collected, including taxes, penalties, interest, additions to tax and additional amounts. The amount of the award will be at least 15% but no more than 30% of the collected proceeds in claims filed in which the Whistleblower Office determines that the information submitted by the whistleblower substantially contributed to the IRS’ detection and recovery of taxes, penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts. 

For claims filed on or after July 1, 2010 where the amount in dispute does not exceed $2 million (and in the case of an individual taxpayer, the taxpayer did not have gross income exceeding $200,000 for at least one taxable year in question), awards will be paid under the discretionary authority of Code §7623(a). Whistleblowers will not have an opportunity to review and comment on the award recommendation nor will they be entitled to seek Tax Court review of the Whistleblower Office determination. 

For claims filed under Code §7623(b)(1), an individual who provides information that leads to an administrative or judicial action resulting in the collection of taxes, penalties interest, additions to tax and additional amounts shall receive an award of at least 15% but not more than 30% of the collected proceeds resulting from such action (including any related actions), or from any settlement in response to such action, in cases in which the IRS determines that the information submitted by the whistleblower substantially contributed to the IRS’ detection and recovery of tax. The amount of any award under Code §7623(b) (1) depends on the extent of the whistleblower’s substantial contribution to the action. 

The starting point for the Whistleblower Office’s analysis will be the statutory minimum of 15 percent of collected proceeds.[xiii] The Whistleblower Office will apply various factors below to the facts of a case to determine whether the case merits a larger award percentage. The factors are described as positive or negative factors, but the analysis may not be reduced to a simple mathematical equation. The factors are not exclusive and are not weighted. In the particular circumstances of a case, one factor may out-weigh several others and result in a unique or exceptional award determination. Negative factors can offset positive factors, but cannot result in an award that is less than the statutory minimum. The absence of negative factors does not mean that the award percentage will be larger than 15%. The Whistleblower Office will determine awards of 15%, 18%, 22%, 26% or 30%. The Whistleblower Office will begin its analysis at the starting point of 15%. The Whistleblower Office may increase the award percentage based on its analysis of the presence and significance of positive factors and may decrease that enhanced award percentage based on its analysis of the presence and significance of negative factors. 

Positive factors include: (i) prompt action by the whistleblower to inform the Government or the taxpayer of the tax noncompliance may, depending on the acts, be a positive factor. For example, providing the Government with an opportunity to address the tax noncompliance early can help mitigate the impact of the noncompliance; (ii) the whistleblower submitting information that identifies an issue of a type previously unknown to the Government or a taxpayer behavior that the Government was unlikely to identify or was especially difficult to detect through the exercise of reasonable diligence; (iii) submissions in which the whistleblower thoroughly presents the details of the noncompliance in a clear and organized manner may, depending on the facts, be a positive factor saving examination resources of the IRS; (iv) the whistleblower (and/or his/her representative) provided exceptional cooperation and assistance during the audit, investigation, or trial, including useful technical or legal analysis of the taxpayer’s records; (v) the whistleblower identified assets of the taxpayers that could be used to pay the taxpayer’s liability or assets not otherwise known to the IRS; (vi) the whistleblower identified connections between transactions, or parties to transactions, which enabled the IRS to understand tax implications that might not otherwise have been revealed; and (viii) and the impact of the report on the behavior of the taxpayer. For example, the whistleblower’s report may, directly or indirectly, cause the taxpayer to correct an improper position.[xiv] 

Negative factors include: (i) the whistleblower delayed reporting after learning the relevant facts, and the delay had an adverse impact on the ability of the IRS to pursue the issues raised. Delayed reporting can allow the noncompliant activity to be repeated, increasing the magnitude of the noncompliance and, in some cases, compromising the ability of the Government to assess and collect; (ii) the whistleblower’s role in the underpayment of tax reported, such as when a whistleblower actively and knowingly participates in carrying out the tax noncompliance. If the whistleblower directly or indirectly profits from the noncompliance, this may also be considered a negative factor; (iii) a whistleblower puts the tax case at risk. For example, a whistleblower’s premature disclosure to the taxpayer of the existence or scope of IRS planned enforcement activity may be a negative factor if the whistleblower disclosed information regarding the IRS interest in a matter in such a way that permitted the affected taxpayer(s) to impede IRS access to relevant information and thus impeded the exam or audit; (iv) whistleblowers will normally be given specific instructions regarding permissible and impermissible activities; violation of these instructions may be a negative factor in determining the award percentage if it causes the IRS to expend additional resources it would not otherwise have spent.[xv] 

Under Code §7623(b)(3), the Whistleblower Office may appropriately reduce an award determination made under either Code §§7623(b)(1) or (b)(2) if the whistleblower planned and initiated the actions that led to the tax underpayment or actions described in Code §7623(b)(2). The applicable range for this category is 0-30%. The whistleblower need not have been the only person involved in planning and initiating for Code §7623(b)(3) to apply.  The Whistleblower Office will use the same framework as for the 0-10% and 15-30% ranges, whichever applies, to reach what would be the award result if the whistleblower had not triggered the application of Code §7623(b)(3) by planning and initiating the actions that led to the tax underpayment. The Whistleblower Office will then evaluate the whistleblower’s role in planning and initiating the actions that led to the underpayment and, based on this evaluation, categorize the whistleblower’s role as a planner and initiator as significant, moderate, or minimal.[xvi] 

The Whistleblower Office will reduce the awards of (1) significant planners and initiators by 66% to 100%, (2) moderate planners and initiators by 33% to 66%, and (3) minimal planners and initiators by 0 to 33%. No award will be paid if the informant is convicted of criminal conduct arising from the role played in the planning and initiating of the actions that led to the underpayment of tax. Planning and initiating factors applicable to Code §7623(b)(3) determinations include: (i) was the whistleblower the sole decision maker, one of several contributing planners and initiators, or an advisor to a decision maker?; (ii) the nature of the whistleblower’s planning and initiating activities. What did the whistleblower do – was it reasonably legitimate tax planning or objectively unreasonable, were steps taken to hide the actions at the planning stage, was there any identifiable misconduct (legal, ethical, etc.) that was either not criminally prosecuted, for whatever reason, or did not result in a criminal conviction (which results in a zero award)? (iii) the extent to which the whistleblower knew or should have known that tax noncompliance was likely to result from the course of conduct; (iv) the extent to which the whistleblower acted in furtherance of the noncompliance, including efforts to conceal the true nature of the transaction; and (v) the whistleblower’s role in identifying and soliciting others to participate in the actions reported, whether as parties to a common transaction or as parties to separate transactions.[xvii] 

Multiple Claims or Joint Claimants. When multiple and independent claims are submitted with respect to the same proceeds, the Whistleblower Office Director may evaluate the contribution of each individual to the assessment and collection of the proceeds and may make an award to each individual commensurate with his or her contribution to the action(s) that resulted in the collection of proceeds.[xviii] In such a case, the Director shall determine whether the IRS as a result of the information previously submitted by any other individual would have obtained the information submitted by each individual. If the Director determines that multiple individuals submitted information that would not have been obtained based on a prior submission, the Director shall determine the amount of each individual’s award based on the extent to which each individual substantially contributed to the action(s). The aggregate award payment in cases involving multiple and independent claims shall be within the range of 15% to 30% of collected proceeds, unless one of the reduction of award percentage provisions applies. 

When multiple individuals jointly submit a claim, the Director shall pay an award in equal shares to the joint claimants, unless the joint claimants specify a different allocation in a written agreement, signed by all joint claimants and notarized and submitted with the claim. The aggregate award payment in cases involving joint claimants shall be within the range of 15% to 30% of collected proceeds, unless one of the reductions of award percentage provisions applies. 

Tax Treatment of Awards. All awards will be subject to current federal tax reporting and withholding requirements. The whistleblower will receive a Form 1099 or other form as may be prescribed by law, regulation, or publication. 

Confidentiality and Disclosure for Whistleblowers. Although the IRS will attempt to protect the identity of the whistleblower, the specific nature of later government inquiries often serves to help the noncompliant taxpayer identify the whistleblower. The identity of the whistleblower will only be disclosed within the IRS on a  “need to know” basis in the performance of their official duties in accordance with Code §6103.[xix] To the extent that the IRS Whistleblower Office determines that an individual is a “whistleblower” under Code §7623, such individual shall be deemed to be a confidential informant whose identity shall be protected in accordance with Code §6103(h) (4). Any contact made between the IRS and the whistleblower will not be a third-party contact under Code §7602(c). IRS personnel are required to treat the identity of the whistleblower and the whistleblower’s information as highly confidential and to exercise extreme security precautions. Also, if the whistleblower is an essential witness in a judicial proceeding, it may not be possible for the government to avoid the identity of the whistleblower. 

Once a claim is submitted, the whistleblower may be told only the status and disposition of the claim – not the action taken in the taxpayer case. A claim can be denied if: (i) the IRS already had the information from another source, (ii) an audit or investigation is conducted but leads to no finding of taxpayer liability, (iii) a finding or liability is made but the taxpayer is successful in an administrative or judicial appeal, or (iv) a finding of liability is made and sustained but there is no collection because the taxpayer has no known assets that the government can collect. Information about the taxpayer is covered by privacy laws and Code §6301, which impose strict limits on what the IRS is able to disclose. 

Whistleblowers who are Current Employees of the Taxpayer.  It is generally assumed that a current employee whistleblower has access to information that may be subject to a privilege that has not been affirmatively waived by the taxpayer. Accordingly, the IRS is particularly sensitive to the privilege issues that may be present in current employee situations. These cases may also raise other issues, such as Constitutional issues and confidentiality issues, which could limit the IRS’s ability to use information received from the informant in any subsequent litigation. To ensure that any adjustments dependent on information received from current employee informants cannot be successfully challenged on evidentiary grounds, the IRS will coordinate a taint review with Operating Division Counsel in current employee cases.[xx] 

To avoid potential limitations on the evidentiary use of information received from a current employee, the IRS should act as a passive recipient of information in every case in which an informant is a current employee of a taxpayer and is providing information regarding the taxpayer/employer. This means that IRS personnel must not encourage, or acquiesce in, any actions taken by the informant. Further, IRS personnel should, however, be ready and willing to accept any and all information from a current employee informant at the initial meeting between the IRS and the informant. Debriefing procedures applicable to civil cases are discussed at IRM 25.2.2.6. 

On a case-by-case basis, the IRS may also initiate limited follow-up contacts, including debriefings, with a current employee informant to clarify information previously received from the informant. Operating Division Counsel should be present to provide support with respect to all follow-up contacts and debriefings. 

A current employee informant may submit additional information to the IRS following the initial submission of information. Generally, the IRS may receive and use this “supplemental” information for the sole purpose of clarifying previously submitted information. Supplemental information includes information that reasonably relates to the previously submitted information, based on an analysis of all the facts and circumstances relating to the information and the IRS’s contacts with the informant, but does not include information that relates to new issues. The IRS must coordinate the analysis with Operating Division Counsel. If Counsel advises that the IRS should not use the information, based on its analysis of the legal risks, then the appropriate IRS Executive will determine whether or how to proceed. 

Whistleblowers who are Current Representatives of a Taxpayer. The IRS will not accept any information from a whistleblower regarding a taxpayer (or related taxpayers) when the whistleblower is also that taxpayer’s representative in any administrative matter pending before the IRS, e.g., an income tax examination, or in any litigation involving issues in which the IRS has any interest (Tax Court and refund litigation, collections suits, summons enforcement actions, etc.).[xxi] If a taxpayer’s representative makes a direct or indirect overture about becoming a whistleblower, e.g., either orally or by filing a Form 3949A, Information Referral, or Form 211, Application for Reward for Original Information, there should be no further interaction with that person as the taxpayer’s representative and the representative must be informed of this outcome immediately. It is the responsibility of the whistleblower to attempt to explain the reason for being excluded from the matter as the taxpayer’s representative under these circumstances. In addition, IRS employees should have no further interaction or contact with, or receive any further information from, the current representative as a whistleblower. The same rules apply and the same results are reached if an individual’s status as a whistleblower regarding a taxpayer (or related taxpayers) predates that individual’s appearance as the taxpayer’s representative in any administrative matter pending before the IRS or in litigation. 

Appeal Rights. The Whistleblower Office will communicate the final claim determination, in writing to the claimant. Final determinations regarding awards under Code §7623(b) may, within 30 days of such determination, be appealed to the United States Tax Court.[xxii] The IRS does not have the authority to extend the 30-day time period for filing an appeal. Decisions under Code §7623(a) may not be appealed to the Tax Court. A letter from the IRS Whistleblower Office denying a claim on the grounds that no award could be made under Code §7623(b) constitutes a determination conferring jurisdiction upon the Tax Court.[xxiii] 

Recently, the Tax Court permitted a whistleblower to pursue his claim anonymously by requiring redaction of all identifying information — both for the whistleblower and for the company referenced in the award claim.[xxiv] The whistleblower, a senior executive in an unnamed company, filed an informant claim with the IRS after allegedly witnessing the company significantly underpay its tax liability through noncompliance with the tax code. The IRS reviewed the informant’s claim but concluded that there were no grounds to make an award under Code §7623(b). In timely petitioning the Tax Court to review the award claim denial, the whistleblower also filed a motion asking for a protective order that would either seal the record or allow him to proceed anonymously. Although the whistleblower had left the company he claimed was tax noncompliant, he argued that revealing his identity in court would create psychological and financial harm, including potential harmful employment repercussions. While the Tax Court’s general approach is that litigation within its domain is a matter of public record, the court also has “broad discretionary authority,” both as a statutory matter and under internal rules, to offer privacy protection. 

In a footnote, the Tax Court warned all whistleblowers should not expect anonymity because each request to proceed anonymously must stand upon its own. Some noted that the Tax Court was making it too easy as a general rule of law to claim the need for anonymity to avoid negative career repercussions in making a whistleblower claim. Congress could have included specific protections for whistleblowers in Code §7623, yet chose to remain silent on the issue. As such, it might be that Congress intended whistleblowers to bear the privacy risks inherent in asking for review of their whistleblower claims in a public forum. 

Annual Report to Congress. Treasury must conduct a study annually and report to Congress on the use of Code §7623, including an analysis of the use of such section during the preceding year and the results of such use.[xxv] For FY 2010 (the year ending September 30, 2010), the IRS received 431 submissions that appear to meet the Code §7623(b) criteria, identifying 5,429 taxpayers that appeared to meet the $2 million of tax, penalties, interest, and additions to tax threshold.[xxvi] Only 9 of 97 full paid claims in FY 2010 involved collections of more than $2 million. For the fiscal year 2007, there were 49 submissions identifying 587 taxpayers; for 2008 there were 378 submissions identifying 1366 taxpayers; and for 2009 there were 470 submissions identifying 2150 taxpayers. Many of the individuals submitting this information claim to have inside knowledge of the transactions they are reporting, and often provide extensive documentation to support their claims. 

At the beginning of FY 2010, the Whistleblower Office staff of 17 included ten analysts with decades of experience in a broad array of IRS compliance programs. After reviewing case intake levels and expected workload as the first award determinations were made under Code §7623(b), the IRS authorized a staff increase to 21 in August 2010. Recruiting for the additional staff was in progress as of the end of FY 2010. 

Through FY 2010, all awards the IRS paid have been based on information received before December 20, 2006, the date of the amendment of Code §7623. Therefore, the IRS paid all of the awards, including those paid in 2010, based on the prior law, what is now Code §7623(a). Thus, the applicable award percentages were those established in prior IRS policy, not the higher percentages set by Code §7623(b). The number and amount of awards paid each year can vary significantly, especially when a small number of high-dollar claims are resolved in one year (as was the case in 2006 and 2008). 

One factor contributing to lower award payments in FY 2009 was a change in the IRS definition of the point at which proceeds in a tax case are available to make an award payment. In the past, the IRS monitored the tax case to ensure that it collected proceeds before processing the award claim. Where the taxpayer filed an administrative or judicial appeal, the IRS did not pay claims until the court finally resolved the appeal. After consultation with the Office of Chief Counsel, the IRS determined that it should not pay claims even when the taxpayer has not filed an appeal until the period for filing an appeal has lapsed. The general rule is that a taxpayer may file a claim for refund within two years of the last payment, unless he or she has waived that right. Thus, beginning in July 2009, the IRS monitors cases for both collection and the lapse of the period for filing a claim for refund. As a result, the IRS did not pay some claims that it would have otherwise paid in FY 2009 until FY 2010 or FY 2011. 

 

[i]. IRC Section 7623(b)

[ii]. Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) 25.2.2.2  (06-18-2010)

[iii]. IRC Section 7623(b)(3)

[iv]. IRC Section 7623(b)(4)

[v]. IRC Section 7623(a) and 26 CFR 301.7623-1

[vi]. IRM 25.2.2.3 (06-18-2010)

[vii]. IRM 25.2.1.2  (12-23-2008)

[viii]. IRM 25.2.2.2  (06-18-2010)

[ix].IRM 25.2.2.2  (06-18-2010)

[x]. See IRS Whistleblower Office, Fiscal Year 2010 Report to the Congress on the Use of Section 7623.

[xi]. IRM 25.2.2.12  (06-18-2010)

[xii]. Cooper v. Commissioner, 136 T.C. 597, 600 (2011)

[xiii]. IRM 25.2.2.9.2 (06-18-2010)

[xiv]. Id.

[xv]. Id.

[xvi]. Id.

[xvii]. Id.

[xviii]. Id.

[xix]. IRM (IRM) 25.2.1.2  (12-23-2008).

[xx]. IRM Exhibit 25.2.2-6 Memorandum from Steven T. Miller, Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support, February 17, 2010

[xxi]. Id.

[xxii]. Before 2006 there was no express statutory provision for judicial review of tax whistleblower claims. See Colman v.United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 633, 638 (2011) (stating that the pre- 2006 tax whistleblower law “cannot serve as the substantive law on which to predicate” jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims).6 This situation changed with the enactment of section 7623(b)(4), which provides that the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction with respect to any determination regarding an award under section 7623(b)(1), (2), or (3). See DaCosta v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 549, 553-555 (2008) (holding that claims under section 7623(b) are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tax Court).

[xxiii]. Cooper v. Commissioner, 135 T.C. 70, 73 (2010).

[xxiv]. Whistleblower 14106-10W v. Commissioner, 137 T.C. No 15 (December 8, 2011).

[xxv]. IRM 25.2.2.14 (06-18-2010)

[xxvi]. See IRS Whistleblower Office, Fiscal Year 2010 Report to the Congress on the Use of Section 7623

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | March 10, 2012

Practice Tips From the Tax Trenches

Although often struggling with deadlines and sometimes recalcitrant clients, a tax practice should be an enjoyable, rewarding experience. Tax practitioners provide their clients with an objective, knowledgeable review of financial information that is ultimately presented to the government in the form of a tax or information return. If the client has provided timely, complete responses to the practitioners requests for information, the process should be fairly smooth and straightforward. Unfortunately, there is a reason many people become clients and it is not because they routinely coordinate all relevant information necessary to the preparation of a return nor do they routinely provide such information in a timely manner.

The 2009-2013 IRS Strategic Plan includes an objective of ensuring that “all tax practitioners, tax preparers, and other third parties in the tax system adhere to professional standards and follow the law.” Possibly more than in any other profession, tax practitioners are required to participate in extensive, ongoing training and education to keep pace with highly complex, ever-changing statutory and case authorities. Cases issued in the morning might impact positions in returns filed later that afternoon. IRS has recently been issuing various internal memoranda focusing its filed operations on the possible imposition of practitioner penalties during the course of examining a tax return. Since a purpose in proposing and assessing return preparer penalties is to encourage accountability, affect behavior, and increase voluntary compliance, examiners are now generally required to comment on preparer penalties as a material part of the examination process.

In a tax practice, everything is fine . . .until it isn’t! Problems tend to arise at the most inopportune moments, such as at the height of tax season or during an examination of a tax return. Issues often arise as a result of:

(1).            Inappropriate reliance on (i) information provided by the taxpayer, (ii) unreasonable factual assumptions (Did you act in good faith?) or (iii) positions in returns prepared by others.

(2).       Inability to control client expectations. Often the client is overly aggressive and unwilling to consider an objective view of the facts in a manner that could compromise the professional relationship between the client and the accountant. There must be an objective analysis of relevant facts leading to any position set forth in a return or provided to the government during an examination.

(3).       Failure of the client to understand the nature and scope of your inquiry. Remote relationships with clients are difficult, at best. A clients interpretation of your question may well differ from yours. Communicating by phone or electronically precludes the knowledge gained by looking someone in the eyes when asking direct, important questions.

(4).       Failure to expect the unexpected. Preparation is a key to success. Are you prepared to handle the issues presented? Lack of diligence in representation, before and during the examination of a return, will adversely affect the outcome of any examination. Failure to inquire about additional facts, to discover contrary legal authorities, to review large, unusual or questionable items in the return, to review prior year returns and potentially applicable IRS Audit Technique Guidelines or  to identify sensitive issues or “patterns” over multiple years can be the difference between a reasonable resolution and someone going to Club Fed (i.e., prison).

(5).       Lack of reasonable cooperation or the failure to provide timely responses during an examination. Practitioners should attempt to cooperate with the examiner in a timely manner. An audit need not be adversarial and the practitioner must maintain appearance of reasonableness throughout the entire process. The examination should not be prolonged simply because the taxpayer is unable to satisfy any resulting deficiency. Practitioners can be subjected to discipline for unreasonably delaying the examination process.

(6).            Government interviews of an unprepared taxpayer or return preparer. Is an interview of the taxpayer or return preparer necessary and unavoidable? Government interviews of the taxpayer or return preparer can create awkward moments during an examination, especially if there has been a lack of preparation. If necessary, interviews should be limited in scope and duration.

(7).       Failure to anticipate conflicts of interest. There are many potential conflicts of interest that can arise during return preparation or the examination process. The practitioner is often unaware a spouse may be considering a divorce or a business relationship may be falling apart. Conflicts can often be avoided by receipt of a timely, knowing and intelligent waiver. However, if things get tough, someone is likely to contest the “knowing” and “intelligent” waiver. Was counsel involved in the waiver process? Did one party feel economically compelled to sign the waiver?

(8).       General lack of experience or competency to handle the issues presented. Were you competent to prepare the return or handle the representation? Being an effective practitioner does not mean you can be all things to all people. Know your limitations and consult your colleagues when you are unsure of any issue. In a profession, professionals help other professionals. Respect those who reach out for assistance and pity those who are embarrassed to do so.

(9).       Failure to properly disclose questionable positions within a return. Have potentially questionable issues been properly disclosed in a return? Form 8275 and Revenue Ruling 2010-15 represent an opportunity to explain, in single syllable words, why the potentially questionable position is not questionable. Disclosures must be adequate and easily understood by anyone reviewing the return. They should not be subject to being interpreted as misleading or incomplete.

(10).            Inadvertent waiver of potential privileges. Privileges are only important when needed the most. Practitioners should have a general awareness of all potentially applicable privileges. When in doubt, ask a colleague for advice.

(11).            Termination of the client relationship and the failure to return client records. Terminating your relationship with a difficult or non-responsive client can be a rewarding experience. When terminating a client relationship, consider returning all client records and remember to notify the government that any outstanding authorizations to receive client information or represent the client have been terminated. Arguing over the return of client records to receive payment for delinquent fees might be rewarded with an unwarranted claim for malpractice. Your other clients deserve your attention and a redirection of your efforts to such clients will be more rewarding over time. Cut your losses and move on . . .or consider referring the difficult client to your business competitors.

(12). Inadequate internal office supervision. Enough said.

(13). Unauthorized use of return information. Return preparers who “knowingly or recklessly” make “unauthorized disclosures or use” of “information furnished in connection with the preparation of an income tax return” are subject to criminal sanctions (i.e., imprisonment!). “Preparers” include those engaged in preparing or assisting in preparing tax returns, including those who provide auxiliary services such as developing software to prepare or e-file a return. “Tax Return Information” includes everything received to prepare the return plus computations, worksheets, and printouts created by the preparer. If uncertain, review Revenue Procedure 2008-35 and Treas. Reg. §301.7216-1, et. seq. for further information and pro forma taxpayer consent forms. Code §7216 was implemented for a purpose. Don’t let that purpose be you. 

Tips From the Tax Trenches. Many experienced, sophisticated practitioners continue to be involved with community and professional organizations and feel free to inquire of their colleagues when facing difficult or unusual issues in their practice. If asked, those within the tax profession will almost always provide extremely valuable insight and advice on issues that could be extremely important for you, your client, and your reputation.  If you do not have the experience or know the answer, find a competent colleague who should be willing to assist you.

If an examination problem seems overwhelming, consider contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS). TAS is an independent organization within the IRS whose employees assist taxpayers who are experiencing economic harm, who are seeking help in resolving tax problems that have not been resolved through normal channels, or who believe that an IRS system or procedure is not working as it should.. You can contact TAS by calling the TAS toll-free case intake line at 1-877-777-4778 or TTY/TDD 1-800-829-4059 to determine whether you are eligible for assistance. You can also call or write to your local taxpayer advocate, whose phone number and address are listed in your local telephone directory and in Publication 1546, Taxpayer Advocate Service – Your Voice at the IRS. You can file Form 911, Request For Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance (And Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order), or ask an IRS employee to complete it on your behalf. For more information, go to http://www.irs.gov/advocate.

Engagement letters should specify the scope and terms of the engagement.  Services rendered should be within the scope of the engagement as clearly set forth in the engagement letter.  If additional services are to be provided, additional engagement letters should  be obtained. If a client relationship is terminated for any reason, written confirmation of the termination should be promptly provided to the client and the opposition. If the government has been involved, the government should also be clearly advised of the termination of the client relationship.

When having returns prepared for a Schedule C taxpayer or a taxpayer involved in a cash intensive business (restaurant, bar, etc.), require the preparation of a simple bank deposit analysis.  The analysis should add the deposits for the twelve month period under consideration and for the month immediately preceding and following the period involved. That figure should then be divided by 14 and multiplied by 12 to determine an approximation of an amount deposited during the year.  If the total deposits bear no relation to reported gross receipts, further inquiry may be warranted which might include a more in-depth bank deposits analysis, a cash expenditures analysis, a net worth analysis and/or a mark-up analysis.

When involved in the preparation of returns for a taxpayer having other return filing requirements (sales tax returns, etc.), request copies of all other relevant returns for the tax period(s) at issue.  Often, businesses prepare certain returns internally and seek to have others prepared by their outside tax advisors. “Gross Receipts” on sales tax returns for the same tax period as an income tax return should be somewhat comparable. If you haven’t received copies of all related returns, ask for them.

Be familiar with IRS Audit Technique Guides (ATG) when providing tax advice, preparing tax returns, preparing for an audit or examination, and when preparing a client for an interview by the government. There are many publicly available ATGs that have been prepared by the IRS. The ATGs coupled with the government’s specialization of examiners is designed to improve compliance by focusing on taxpayers as members of particular groups.  Each ATG instructs the agent on typical methods of auditing a particular group of taxpayer, including typical sources of income, questions to be asked of the taxpayer and their representative during the audit, etc.  These groups have been defined by type of business (i.e., gas stations, grocery stores, etc.), technical issues (passive activity losses), types of taxpayer (i.e., returns lacking economic reality), or method of operation (i.e., cash businesses).  A practitioner should not proceed with an audit without being generally familiar with any potentially relevant IRS ATGs. Often, it may be beneficial to review relevant ATGs earlier in the process…perhaps while preparing the return.

The administrative process should not be abused merely because of the taxpayer’s desire to delay the determination and collection of any potential liability. It is generally advisable to attempt to resolve any civil tax dispute at the earliest opportunity.  A lengthy audit may be costly from the perspective of the expenditure of time and effort involved, as well as the taxpayer’s degree of frustration with the normal administrative process. Further, a prolonged audit is more likely to uncover potentially sensitive issues that could generate increased tax deficiencies, penalties, or the possibility of criminal sanctions. Collection-related issues should be sorted out through an installment payment arrangement that would be negotiated through the normal collection process following conclusion of the audit process.

It is often a good practice to provide an extension of the applicable statute of limitations during the course of any audit or examination.  However, it is also good practice to have extensions signed by the client, rather than the client’s authorized representative (even though authorized by the power of attorney). Years later, the client may not recall having authorized you to extend the statute of limitations.  If their signature is on the extension (Form 872), the situation will not likely escalate.  Further, it is almost always preferred to sign a limited extension with a specified expiration date (Form 872) rather than an indefinite extension for an unspecified term (Form 872-A).

It is often advisable to submit a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) following the unagreed resolution of a federal tax examination. It should also help tailor your discussions at the next administrative level while providing insight into what the next government representative assigned to the case will be reviewing. The process is relatively simple and inexpensive. Relevant information regarding the submission of a FOIA request is readily available at www.irs.gov by searching “FOIA.”

A question often presented is whether the taxpayer and others should consent to interviews by the government, force the issuance of Summonses or invoke various Constitutional protections.  Certainly, if there are extremely sensitive (i.e., potentially criminal) issues, the taxpayer should not consent to an interview and should invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.  It is always preferable for a taxpayer to avoid providing incriminating information when compared with the possibility of propelling a civil tax examination into a criminal tax investigation/ prosecution.

The government typically seeks to interview taxpayers near the commencement of an examination.  Unfortunately, at that time, the practitioner typically does not have sufficient information to determine whether there are potentially sensitive issues that might arise during an interview of the taxpayer.  If possible, it is often preferable to postpone a taxpayer interview if the practitioner is otherwise able to provide prompt responses to relevant inquiries.  If it occurs, the interview should occur toward the end of the examination, possibly with an understanding that if the taxpayer submits to an interview and answers the questions, the government will proceed to close the examination.  However, the practitioner must take extreme caution, since such an understanding is not likely a basis for challenging the use of statements from the interview in a subsequent proceeding.

If a taxpayer interview is necessary and otherwise unavoidable (it is always avoidable in a potentially criminal sensitive issue case), the interview should occur far into the audit process such that the representative can appropriately assist the taxpayer in preparing for the interview.  The representative should attempt to obtain as much information about the issues, the information within the agent’s possession and the government’s position with regard to the issues, before agreeing to submit the taxpayer to an interview.  Under any situation, the representative must prevent presentation of false or misleading information or the presentation of false statements by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative.  Presentation of false statements or documents significantly enhances the potential for penalties and a possible criminal investigation/prosecution (that may include an investigation of the representative!).

Although there are various “badges of fraud,” civil revenue agents are more inclined to consider a criminal referral if there is a substantial unexplainable understatement of taxable income, fictitious or improper deductions, accounting irregularities (occurring in more than one year), acts or conduct of the taxpayer relating to false statements, attempts to hinder the examination, destruction of books and records, transfers of assets for purposes of concealment, or patterns of consistent failure to report or under-reporting of income. Certain behavior patterns on the part of the examiner may indicate that they are considering a criminal referral – excessive time devoted to the audit; extensive copying of basic financial records, bank records, accountant work papers, etc.; or attempts to determine the taxpayer’s net worth over a period of several years.

Do not inadvertently exceed the scope of your license or experience.  At a minimum, a non-lawyer representative should strongly recommend that a client consult counsel with admonition that discussions held between a client and a non-lawyer may have to be disclosed in the event of a criminal investigation or prosecution.  Section 7525 of the Internal Revenue Code does not protect information provided to the non-lawyer representative from disclosure in a criminal investigation or prosecution.

Throughout, treat all government representatives with respect and act like the professional that you want others to know and respect.  Do not mislead, affirmatively or otherwise, anyone at anytime. Always maintain the appearance of reasonableness…even in times where the government may appear to be anything but reasonable. If you have problems with an agent during the course of an examination, ask to speak to their manager. If you have problems, it is likely that other representatives have previously had similar discussions with the agent’s manager. While the manager may appear to be supporting the agent when meeting with you, it is also likely that the manager will have a direct conversation with the agent outside your presence and that your future interactions with the agent will be significantly improved.

Be All You Can Be. A busy tax practice can be surrounded by minefields. Use your best efforts and remember that a tax return is not an offer to negotiate with the government. Document your advice in writing, limit the nature and scope of services to be provided in your engagement letter, establish a system of checklists (and follow the system), and use your best judgment.  If the client is unwilling to accept and follow your advice, strongly consider terminating the engagement. Life is short and the headaches of trying to convince someone to do the right thing may simply not be worth your effort.  If you encounter an undeserving or possibly disrespectful client, let them go and move on with your practice. Ninety-eight percent of the problems come from 2% of the clients.  You cannot be all things to all people…regardless of the effort and personal sacrifice.  Lastly and perhaps most importantly, your client is not your friend . . .if you feel the need for friends, get a dog!

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

FBAR Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI)

Taxpayers who have failed to report earnings on foreign bank accounts have until August 31, 2011 to do so without imposition of criminal penalties and with reduced civil penalties.  The reduced penalties apply to taxpayers who comply with the Internal Revenue Service’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (2011 OVDI), but only if the taxpayers do so before the IRS is aware of their prior tax-related indiscretions.  This is the second IRS initiative focused on undeclared interests in foreign financial accounts. In 2009, the IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (2009 OVDP) offered a more taxpayer friendly resolution than the 2011 OVDI for taxpayers who contacted the IRS before October 15, 2009. 

United States citizens and residents are taxable on their worldwide income and are subject to the full jurisdiction of the laws of the United States.[i] Under the Bank Secrecy Act[ii], United States citizens, residents or persons in and doing business in the United States must file an information report with the government if they have a financial account in a foreign country with a value exceeding $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. Taxpayers comply with this law by acknowledging the account on Schedule B of their income tax return and by filing Form TD 90-22.1, the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR). Having a legal or beneficial interest in a foreign financial account does not violate United States.  However, intentionally failing to report the earnings on the account and to file an FBAR may be a violation. 

Many United States taxpayers and their advisors have long been unaware of or have simply ignored the FBAR information reporting requirements. Willfully failing to file an FBAR can be subject to both criminal sanctions, including imprisonment, and civil penalties equivalent to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the highest balance in an unreported foreign account per year for each year since 2004 for which an FBAR was not filed. Line 7a of Schedule B of Form 1040 generally asks the taxpayer for a somewhat unsophisticated “yes” or “no” answer to the question: “At any time during the [tax year], did you have an interest in or a signature or other authority over a financial account in a foreign country, such as a bank account, securities account, or other financial account?” The instructions to Schedule B provide a general description of the FBAR and how to obtain a copy of the FBAR[iii]. Schedule B and the instructions provide the government with what some consider an important “willfulness” link between an income tax return and the FBAR filing requirements since taxpayers are deemed to know the information contained in their income tax return.[iv]

On February 8, 2011, IRS Commissioner Douglas H. Shulman announced the 2011 OVDI and stated: “As we continue to amass more information and pursue more people internationally, the risk to individuals hiding assets offshore is increasing. As I’ve said all along, the goal is to get people back into the United States tax system . . . Combating international tax evasion is a top priority for the IRS. We have additional cases and banks under review. This new disclosure initiative is the last, best chance for people to get back into the system . . . .Tax secrecy continues to erode . . . We are not letting up on international tax issues, and more is in the works. For those hiding cash or assets offshore, the time to come in is now. The risk of being caught will only increase . . .”[v]

Under the 2011 OVDI, eligible taxpayers must contact the IRS Criminal Investigation (CI) by August 31, 2011 and request participation in the program.  Taxpayers must file all original and amended income tax returns (generally including tax years 2003 through 2010) and pay taxes (or make good faith arrangements to pay taxes), interest and 20 percent accuracy-related penalties on the income tax deficiencies. If applicable, delinquency penalties for the failure to file returns or pay the tax may also be required. Financial transactions occurring before 2003 are mostly irrelevant for those participating in the 2011 OVDI.

The 2011 OVDI penalty framework requires a 25 percent offshore penalty equal to the highest value of the financial account and assets between 2003 and 2010. Only a single 25 percent offshore penalty will be applied with respect to voluntary disclosures relating to the same account and assets. Taxpayers with beneficial ownership interests in the account and making the voluntary disclosures may allocate the offshore penalty in any manner they choose. The applicable 2011 OVDI penalties are identified in a series of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) available by searching “OVDI” at irs.gov.

The 2011 OVDI limits potential penalties to those specifically stated within the 2011 OVDI. Taxpayers who wish to participate must submit a pre-clearance request, including identifying information (name, date of birth, taxpayer identification number and address) and Power of Attorney, if represented, by fax to the IRS CI Lead Development Center at (215) 861-3050. If the taxpayer is already within the CI database (due to an ongoing IRS examination of the taxpayer or perhaps a related entity, thereby already giving the IRS information pertaining to the taxpayer’s foreign account), an untimely effort to participate in the 2011 OVDI will not be successful. As such, a taxpayer would be unwise to initially provide CI with any information beyond the taxpayer’s name, date of birth, taxpayer identification number and address until the CI has made an initial determination that the taxpayer may be eligible to participate.

Following receipt of a request to participate in the 2011 OVDI, CI will notify taxpayers or their representatives via fax whether or not the taxpayer has been cleared to make a voluntary disclosure using the Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter[vi]. Presently, such notifications are being received within approximately 10 days following submission of the request to participate in the 2011 OVDI. Taxpayers or representatives with questions regarding their 2011 OVDI pre-clearance can call (215) 861-3759 or contact the nearest Criminal Investigation Office. Pre-clearance is merely the initial phase and does not guarantee a taxpayer acceptance into the 2011 OVDI.

Within 30 days following notification of pre-clearance by CI, a taxpayer must submit a completed Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter to the IRS Criminal Investigation, Attn: Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Coordinator, 600 Arch Street, Room 6404, Philadelphia, PA 19106. The IRS will review the Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter and notify the taxpayer or representative by mail whether the voluntary disclosure has been preliminarily accepted or declined. If notified that their voluntary disclosure has been preliminarily accepted, the taxpayer has until August 31, 2011 to submit the remaining information and make payment with respect to the taxpayer’s full Voluntary Disclosure Package[vii] for all applicable years to IRS, 3651 S. I H 35 Stop 4301 AUSC, Austin, TX  78741 ATTN: 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative.

In the Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter, the taxpayer must identify or provide the reason the offshore account was created; the source of deposited funds; an estimated annual range of the highest aggregate value for the accounts/assets; an estimated potential annual unreported income from the account; the foreign financial institutions and foreign advisors relating to the account; other affiliated account-holders; and an explanation of meetings with others regarding the account or assets. Similar information provided by participants in the expired 2009 OVDP continues to serve the government well in ongoing civil and criminal investigations of foreign financial institutions and advisors.  In turn, each investigation uncovers additional leads to other institutions and advisors who have assisted United States taxpayers avoid their reporting obligations. Information provided under the 2009 OVDP and the 2011 OVDI will continue to provide the government with a target rich environment for many years.

Taxpayers who are foreign residents and who were unaware they were United States citizens may qualify for a reduced 5 percent offshore penalty instead of the mandatory 20 percent offshore penalty[viii].  The 5 percent offshore penalty will also apply to taxpayers who: (i) did not open or cause the account to be opened (unless the bank required that a new account be opened, rather than allowing a change in ownership of an existing account, upon the death of the owner of the account); (ii) have exercised minimal, infrequent contact with the account, for example, to request the account balance, or update accountholder information such as a change in address, contact person, or email address; (iii) have, except for a withdrawal closing the account and transferring the funds to an account in the United States not withdrawn more than $1,000 from the account in any year covered by the voluntary disclosure; and (iv) can establish that all applicable United States taxes have been paid on funds deposited to the account (only account earnings have escaped United States taxation). Funds deposited before January 1, 1991 will be presumed to have been appropriately taxed if no information is otherwise available.[ix] This presumption might work against taxpayers pursuing the 5 percent reduced offshore penalty for accounts that include post-1990 deposits where information is not available.

If the highest aggregate account balance in each of the years covered by the 2011 OVDI is less than $75,000, the taxpayer will qualify for a 12.5 percent offshore penalty.[x] The highest aggregate account balance includes the fair market value of assets in undisclosed offshore entities and the fair market value of any foreign assets that were either acquired with improperly untaxed funds or produced improperly untaxed income.  IRS examiners will have no authority to negotiate a different offshore penalty.

FBARs for 2010 are due on June 30, 2011, without extension.  Taxpayers who reported and paid tax on all their taxable income but did not file FBARs should not participate in the 2011 OVDI but should merely file the delinquent FBARs with the Department of Treasury, Post Office Box 32621, Detroit, MI 48232-0621 (and attach a statement explaining why the reports are filed late). The IRS will not impose a penalty for the failure-to-file the delinquent FBARs if there are no under-reported tax liabilities and the FBARs are filed by August 31, 2011.[xi]

Under the 2011 OVDI, taxpayers are not required to pay a penalty greater than what they would otherwise be liable for under the maximum penalties imposed under existing statutes.[xii] A similar provision in the 2009 OVDP has caused considerable frustration among taxpayers and their representatives. The understanding of potentially applicable penalties may differ greatly in the eyes of a taxpayer as compared to an IRS examiner. Anyone considering a 2011 OVDI submission must carefully examine all potential civil penalties and evaluate the actual risk of criminal prosecution.

Criminal prosecutions generally require a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty. For many taxpayers, the actual risk of criminal prosecution might not be realistic. Many taxpayers with foreign bank accounts are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who are unfamiliar with the filing and reporting requirements. The determination of whether the government might be able to demonstrate a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty to appropriately report an interest in a foreign account or asset must be carefully considered before determining whether to participate or not in the 2011 OVDI. Taxpayers and their advisors should ask whether the prospect of a criminal prosecution can somehow be reduced or eliminated by filing amended or delinquent returns and FBARs in lieu of a direct participation in the 2011 OVDI.

Potential civil penalties associated with undisclosed interests in foreign accounts and assets can far overshadow the current value of such accounts and assets. This raises several questions:  Is there some method of reducing the potentially applicable penalty exposure without participating in the 2011 OVDI? Could filing amended or delinquent returns and FBARs in lieu of a direct participation in the 2011 OVDI reduce these civil penalties? What would be the potentially applicable penalties upon an examination of such returns and FBARs? In any such examination, would the government take retribution since the taxpayer effectively declined participating in the 2011 OVDI? Will the government pursue non-compliant taxpayers through the required judicial process following assessment of an FBAR penalty?[xiii]

In answering these questions, it is important to consider that the ability of a United States taxpayer to maintain an undisclosed, “secret” foreign financial account is fast becoming nonexistent. Information regarding undisclosed interests in foreign financial accounts and assets flows into the government on an almost daily basis. Financial mercenaries (a.k.a. “whistleblowers” or informants) are lurking within substantially every foreign institution. Tax treaties and information exchange agreements, information developed through submissions and interviews of 2009 OVDP participants and those who will participate in the 2011 OVDI, information provided by foreign institutions and advisors (whether indicted or not) continues to generate additional leads to taxpayers and their advisors. Additional information will become available as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act and Foreign Financial Asset Reporting[xiv] become effective in the next few years.

The 2011 OVDI emphasizes maximum penalties by eliminating examiner discretion. It specifically includes foreign assets, real estate, foreign entities, etc. in the offshore penalty calculation, especially if assets are acquired with funds subject to United States taxation. Contents of foreign safe deposit boxes may be subjected to the offshore penalty together with other foreign assets acquired with funds that were subject to United States tax but on which no such tax was paid. The offshore penalty would apply regardless of whether the assets are producing current income. Assuming that the assets were acquired with after tax funds or from funds that were not subject to United States taxation, if the assets have not yet produced any income, there has been no United States taxable event and no reporting obligation to disclose.

It is not possible to know exactly what will happen to taxpayers who decide to risk detection by the IRS and the imposition of substantial civil penalties, including the civil fraud penalty, numerous foreign information return penalties, and the potential risk of criminal prosecution. Full examinations? For how many tax years? Taxpayer and return preparer interviews? Maximum civil penalties? Criminal investigations? Will Congress later enact a strict-liability death penalty for non-compliant taxpayers?

The ability to properly advise a client regarding participation in the 2011 OVDI requires an understanding of the potentially applicable foreign-related penalties for non-participants, the historic IRS and Department of Justice voluntary disclosure practice and policies and a healthy respect for the ongoing governmental international tax enforcement efforts within a shrinking global community. Also, the representative must be aware that relevant processes and procedures seem to change frequently . . . and without notice.

Many taxpayers will decide to participate in the 2011 OVDI and comply with the tax reporting laws now that they are aware of the FBAR and other foreign account reporting requirements. Others may wish to take advantage of an opportunity to repatriate stagnant foreign funds or simply move on with their lives. The IRS is committed to enforcement concerning offshore accounts and can be expected to continue to enhance these efforts. Through these enforcement efforts, along with the changing environment concerning bank secrecy, the IRS will undoubtedly uncover the otherwise undisclosed foreign accounts of many overly optimistic taxpayers.  Nevertheless, the IRS simply will not be able to locate the vast majority of foreign account holders through enforcement efforts alone. But each non-compliant taxpayer that the IRS detects will no doubt forever regret missing the opportunity to participate in the “the last, best chance . . . to get back into the system.”


[i].    26 U.S.C. §61, et. seq.

[ii].    See 31 U.S.C §§5311-5330 and 31 CFR Chapter X (Effective March 1, 2011; formerly 31 CFR Part 103 through February 28, 2011).

[iii].   www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f90221.pdf.

[iv].   The Internal Revenue Manual [IRM 4.26.16.5.3  (07-01-2008)] specifically provides that the mere fact that a person checked the wrong box, or no box, on a Schedule B is not sufficient, by itself, to establish that the FBAR violation was attributable to willful blindness. However, taxpayers should exercise caution in asserting a lack of willfulness when the wrong box has been checked on Schedule B. All relevant facts and circumstances must be fully developed and carefully considered.

[v].   IRS Commissioner Douglas H. Shulman, February 8, 2011 (IR-2011-14)

[vi].   The 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter is available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/2011-ovdi-irs-ci-letter-01-31-2011.doc

[vii].  The 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Package includes various documents and forms identified at  http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=235584,00.html

[viii]. FAQ 52 of the 2011 OVDI

[ix].   Id.

[x].   FAQ 53 of the 2011 OVDI

[xi].   FAQ 17 of the 2011 OVDI

[xii]. FAQ 50 of the 2011 OVDI

[xiii]. The period of limitation on collection of FBAR penalties is found in 31 U.S.C. §5321(b)(2). The government may commence a civil action to recover a civil penalty assessed under subsection (a) at any time before the end of the two year period beginning on the later of: (i) The date the penalty was assessed; or (ii) The date any judgment becomes final in any criminal action under  31 U.S.C. §5322 in connection with the same transaction with respect to which the penalty is assessed. The date the FBAR penalty is assessed is the date that the IRS designated official stamps IRS Form 13448. See  IRM 4.26.17.5.5.2  (01-01-2007)

[xiv]. 26 U.S.C. § 6038D

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

Non-Filers Beware: Who’s That Knocking at Your Door ?

The IRS continues to enhance its ongoing enforcement efforts and expedited reporting between the IRS and the state taxing agencies will have a significant future impact on taxpayers who, for whatever reason, have failed to timely file their tax returns. The government can better identify taxpayers who have underreported or not reported income or have otherwise failed to file returns. As a result, hunting for non-filers will likely become the trophy sport for the IRS!

Non-Filers. A “non-filer” is a taxpayer (or someone who the government believes ought to be a taxpayer) who does not file their return before the deadline to file the next year’s return. A “late filer” is taxpayer who misses the deadline for the year in question, but files the return within the following year. Many non-filers analyze optional strategies given the probability of audit and detection and the extent of penalties, if discovered. Others claim to be trapped into non-filing status because of past decisions. Typically, non-filers fall into three categories: 

i)            Procrastinators – Know they should file but need assistance and/or prompting.  They will typically respond and always indicate that they will cooperate.  However, information is generally slowly provided in a piecemeal fashion.

ii)            Uncooperative Non-Filers – They refuse to acknowledge and respond to correspondence and/or phone calls and state up front that they will not cooperate.

iii)         Tax Protestors – Advocate and/or use tax protestor’s schemes (i.e. refusal to file because of alleged constitutional reasons). 

The IRS has identified at least 10 million delinquent returns and is pursuing a cross-functional National Non-Filer Strategy to identify non-compliant taxpayers and design methods to encourage their compliance.  Before contacting a non-filer, the IRS will often attempt to identify the non-filer’s occupation, location of bank/savings accounts, sources of income, age, current address, last file returned, adjusted gross income of last file returned, taxes paid on last file returned – amounts and methods of payment (withholding, estimated tax, pre-payments), number of years delinquent, and the non-filer’s standard of living.  They will search public records for evidence of additional unreported income, tax assessor and real estate records for assets held by the non-filer, and records of professional associations and business license bureaus for information on businesses being operated by the non-filer. They will also search various state records to disclose corporate charter information including principals of any businesses that have failed to file returns. 

Determining the specific occupation of the non-filer can lead to additional sources of information, such as labor unions, professional societies, trade associations, etc.. IRS will also determine whether there is a history of non-filing (multiple non-filed years provide a pattern of behavior), whether there have been repeated contacts by the IRS, indications that the non-filer had knowledge of filing requirements (i.e. professional with an advanced education, person who works directly in the tax field), whether there are a large number of cash transactions (i.e. purchases by cash, cash deposits as evidenced by currency transaction reports, etc.) and whether there are indications of significant unreported income (i.e. substantial interests and dividends earned, investments in IRA accounts, stock and bond transactions, high mortgage interest paid, etc.). 

If a non-filer is contacted by the government, the examiner will determine the cause (does the non-filer lack records, ability to pay, lack of education, etc.) and may offer necessary information or assistance (preparation of returns, payment arrangement information, etc.) to secure full cooperation. If the non-filer is uncooperative (won’t respond or refuses to cooperate), third party contacts and Summonses will be issued. If the examiner discovers subsequent acts of tax evasion (false statements, refusal to make records available, etc.), they will consider whether the case should be referred for a criminal investigation. The examiner will also be alert to attempts by the non-filer to conceal or transfer assets to evade collection of tax later assessed. In these cases, a jeopardy (immediate) assessment may be considered. 

During non-filer examinations, the examiner will determine if related returns (corporate, partnership, employment tax, and excise tax returns) have been filed as required.  They will also search for spin-off cases involving relatives, employees, employers, subcontractors, partners, and even return preparers!  If a non-filer is involved in a family business, the examiner should determine if all family members have filed returns.  If the non-filer is involved in a partnership, the IRS should determine if partnership returns have been filed and determine if all partners have filed returns.  For delinquent corporate returns, they should determine if all shareholders have filed returns. 

The IRS may independently prepare a tax return and the related assessments under Internal Revenue Code § 6020 (b).  These assessments are generally based on very limited information, such as that gathered from Forms W-2 and 1099.  For these cases, IRS assesses the maximum potential tax owed based on gross receipts since they don’t have access to potential deductions, exemptions or credits available to the taxpayer. By failing to file a return, a taxpayer may also lose a refund of any amounts withheld. The failure to file and pay self-employment tax by self-employed individuals could cause them to be ineligible for social security retirement or disability benefits. 

The role of IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) in the National Non-Filer Strategy is generally the enforcement of the tax laws for individuals who are not responsive to outreach efforts. IRS-CI has developed and investigates high impact investigations of non-filers in various occupations and industries, as well as those who file non-processable returns or employ frivolous arguments which the courts have repeatedly rejected. The majority of people who come forward and file returns prior to being notified by IRS are not pursued through a criminal investigation. However, a non-filer should not wait since the “first knock on the door” may be that of a special agent from IRS-CI. 

Voluntary Disclosure. Practitioners often struggle with the issue of whether a taxpayer can avoid a criminal tax investigation by making a disclosure to the IRS.  A “voluntary disclosure” is generally the process of voluntarily reporting previously undisclosed income (or false deductions) through an amended return or the filing of a delinquent return.  A taxpayer’s timely, voluntary disclosure of a significant unreported tax liability is an important factor to the IRS in considering whether the matter should be referred to the U.S. Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. Properly resolving this issue can mean the difference between a taxpayer being criminally excused of a tax crime or being convicted on the basis of admissions derived from the voluntary disclosure itself. 

Certainly, the IRS has a somewhat limited capacity to perform criminal investigations. However, a significant amount of time is not required to criminally investigate and prosecute a non-filer, particularly one who files delinquent or amended returns following an IRS inquiry. Without adequate representation, the perceived light at the other end of the voluntary disclosure tunnel….may be the IRS train coming straight at the taxpayer! 

The IRS voluntary disclosure policy creates no substantive or procedural rights for taxpayers, but rather is a matter of internal IRS practice, provided solely for internal guidance to IRS personnel. Taxpayers cannot rely on the fact that other similarly situated taxpayers may not have been recommended for criminal prosecution.  A timely voluntary disclosure will not guarantee immunity from criminal prosecution, but a true voluntary disclosure will normally result in the IRS not even recommending a criminal prosecution to the Department of Justice. 

A voluntary disclosure must be truthful, timely and complete, and the taxpayer must demonstrate a willingness to cooperate (and must in fact cooperate) with the IRS in determining the correct tax liability. The taxpayer must make good faith arrangements with the IRS to pay in full, the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable. Additionally, the policy only applies to income earned through a legal business – - so called “legal source” income. 

To be timely, the disclosure must be received before: (i) the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation of the taxpayer, or has notified the taxpayer that it intends to commence such an examination or investigation; (ii) the IRS has received information from a third party (e.g., informant, other governmental agency, or the media) alerting the IRS to the specific taxpayer’s noncompliance; (iii) the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation which is directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer; or (iv) the IRS has acquired information directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer from a criminal enforcement action (e.g., search warrant, grand jury subpoena). 

A voluntary disclosure does not occur until IRS has actually been contacted. As such, it is imperative that the disclosure occur as quickly as possible.  A voluntary disclosure cannot be made anonymously. Any plan by a taxpayer, or their representative, to resolve a tax liability, file a correct return, or offer payment of taxes for an anonymous client is not to be considered a voluntary disclosure. IRS will rarely recommend prosecution if there has been a timely voluntary disclosure.  Since returns filed pursuant to a timely voluntary disclosure have significant audit potential, they should be “bulletproof” in correctly reflecting the taxpayer’s income and expense items.  Due to various federal-state information sharing agreements, any applicable state returns should obviously be contemporaneously filed or amended with the federal returns. Returns for related entities should also be contemporaneously filed or amended. If a return filed pursuant to a voluntary disclosure is less than accurate, the taxpayer is compounding – - not helping the problem. 

How many returns must be filed or amended?  While there is certainly no well-established rule as to how many returns must be filed in making a voluntary disclosure, the general consensus is probably six tax years since the applicable statute of limitations for most tax related crimes is six years.  The disclosure should eliminate any government concern that there might be any potential issues with respect to a particular tax year for which the applicable statute of limitations for criminal prosecutions has not already expired. Additional returns could be in order since the statute of limitations for a criminal prosecution is tolled for the period of time a taxpayer is outside of the United States or is a fugitive from justice. 

Typically, in a civil context, it is also the IRS policy to enforce the filing of returns for the prior 6 tax years.  In considering whether shorter or longer periods should be civilly enforced, the IRS will determine the prior history of non-compliance, the possible existence of income from illegal sources, the effect on voluntary compliance, the anticipated revenue in relation to the time and effort required to determine the tax due, and special circumstances existing in the case of a particular taxpayer, class of taxpayer, or industry, which may be particular to the class of tax involved.  The objective of the National Non-Filer Strategy is to bring non-filers back into the tax system by securing a substantially correct delinquent return. 

Counsel must determine whether to contact the IRS before submitting a voluntary disclosure and actually filing the delinquent or amended tax returns.  Some practitioners prefer to submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking income information already in the possession of the IRS before filing the returns.  Some simply choose to file the delinquent or amended returns, with payment, with the appropriate IRS service center (now referred to as a “campus”) by certified mail, return receipt requested.  Filings are often sent in separately for each tax year spaced out over a brief time period.  Such filings occur during the typical tax return filing season – around April 15 and October 15 for individual returns. When you run with the bulls…. 

“Do The Right Thing.” Tax laws cannot be administered by solely relying on enforcement because the government simply does not have resources to react after-the-fact to compliance concerns. Instead, taxpayers must be educated about their obligations and encouraged to “do the right thing.” Complex tax rules tend to be the oil fields into which the “perennial loophole seekers punch holes looking for a gusher.” The best strategy is full compliance with the filing and reporting requirements…don’t wait to find a stranger knocking on the door!

 

 

 

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

Examining the FBAR / Offshore Account Information Document Request (IDR)

Questions regarding the depth of an offshore account examination for those who, for whatever reason, did not participate in the 2009 OVDP or the 2011/2012 OVDI are now beginning to be answered in various IRS examinations around the country. A voluntary disclosure would not likely be considered timely following receipt of a notice of an IRS examination. These examinations are highly focused on the source of funds deposited into the foreign financial account, earnings on the account and the reasoning behind the taxpayer not previously pursuing a voluntary disclosure. A non-taxable nature of the funds deposited (such as an inheritance or deposits before the taxpayer became a U.S. person) does not seem to slow the momentum of these examinations. 

The initial IDR issued in connection with the commencement of a examination involving previously undisclosed offshore financial accounts will seem overwhelming to even the most seasoned tax practitioners. Predictably, the IRS appears to have somewhat standardized their IDR in these matters by requesting everything imaginable with respect to the taxpayer under examination and all related entities. For the year under examination, a typical offshore account IDR will request that the taxpayer provide: 

A.       TAX RETURNS. 

1.         Provide copies of all Tax Returns and Information Return Forms filed:

            a. Form-l040, U.S. Income Tax Return for Individuals including all schedules and attached informational returns for the year.

            b. Forms 1099 received by the taxpayer for the year.

            c. Forms 1099 issued by the taxpayer for the year.

            d. Forms 1065. U.S. Partnership Return of Income including all schedules and attached informational returns for the year.

            e. Forms 1120 and 1120S, U.S. Corporate Income Tax Returns including all schedules and attached informational returns for the year for each corporation, of which taxpayer owned or exercised control over more than 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock or more than 50 percent of the total value of the stock of the corporation.

            f. Form 1120F, U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign Corporation including all schedules and attached informational returns for the year 2008 for each corporation of which the taxpayer owned or exercised control over more than 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock or more than 50 percent of the total value of the stock of the corporation.

            g. Form 1041, U.S. Income-Tax Return for Estates and Trusts, including all schedules and attached information returns for which the taxpayer was the administrator, executor, fiduciary, trustee, grantor, or a beneficiary for year.

            h. Form l040NR (used for foreign trusts), U.S, Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return. including all schedules and attached information returns for which the taxpayer was the administrator, executor, or beneficiary for the year.

            i.   Form 3520A, Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner for year 2008 for which the taxpayer is treated as an owner.

            j.  Form 3520, Annual Return to Report Transactions with Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts for the year for which the taxpayer is or is treated as an owner.

            k.   Form 1042, Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Sourced Income of Foreign Persons for the year.

            l.  Form 1042S, Foreign Persons U.S. Source Income Subject to withholding for the year.

            m. Form 5471, Information Return of a Person With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations for the year.

            n. Form 5471. Information Return of a. 25-percent Foreign-Owned Corporation or a Foreign Corporation Engaged, in a U.S. Trade or Business for the year.

            o. All amended tax returns and informational returns. 

B.       BANK RECORDS 

1.         For each bank account, in any name, whether foreign or domestic, over which the taxpayer had signature other authority and/or over which the taxpayer exercised control, during the year, produce all documents in the taxpayer’s possession, custody, or control including, but not limited to:

            a. account applications (regardless of date; in english)

            b. monthly or periodic statements (in english)

            c. wire transfer authorizations and confirmations

            d. deposit slips’ and deposited items

            e. credit and debit memos and advices

            f. cancelled checks

            g. check registers

            h. passbooks

            l. loan applications (regardless of date)

            j. promissory notes

            k.. certificates of deposit

            1. letters of credit

            m. cashiers checks

            n. money orders

            o. safe deposit box rental agreements (regardless of date)

            p. safe deposit box visitation ledgers

            q. all correspondence/emails (in english) from the inception of the account through today

            r. memorandum files maintained by the bank or other financial institution or any of their officers or employees, reflecting communications between the bank and the taxpayer or others acting on the taxpayer’s behalf and documenting actions taken pursuant to directions received from the taxpayer or on the taxpayer’s behalf, reflecting any thoughts or decisions of the bank or its employees or officers regarding the account

            s. documents verifying the origin of all funds used to open the accounts or deposited to these accounts (regardless of date).

2.         For the year, provide all period statements for each bank account, whether foreign or domestic, under any name, over which the taxpayer had signature or other authority or over which the taxpayer exercised control.

3.         For each bank account, whether foreign or domestic, under any name, over which the taxpayer had signature or other authority and/or over which the taxpayer exercised control during the year produce the Know Your Customer Account information given to the bank and/or financial institution by the taxpayer and/or on the taxpayer’s behalf including. but not limited to, all account set up documents (regardless of the year), such as signature cards, opening deposit slips, passport copies, certificates of beneficial ownership, letters of reference, certificates of clean funds and/or other source of funds documentation. 

4.      For each Certificate of Deposit, Time Deposit, or equivalent account at a bank or financial institution. whether foreign or domestic, over which the taxpayer had signature authority or other authority or over which the taxpayer exercised control at any time during the year produce statements of certificate of deposit, records reflecting purchase of the certificate, earnings, records reflecting redemption or other disposition of the certificate. In addition, provide documents verifying the origin of all funds used to open these accounts or deposited to these accounts at any time. 

5.         For all transfers of funds during the year between all bank accounts, financial accounts, and other accounts over which the taxpayer had signature or other authority, or over which the taxpayer exercised control during the year,  provide the following:

a. list of transfers

b. documents showing the source of the funds transferred (e.g.; copy of check- back and front, wire transfer authorizations, bank statement, source of cash deposit)

            c. documents showing the deposit of the funds transferred (e.g., bank statement)

            d. advice memos, correspondence or other direction the taxpayer sent or received regarding the transfers, withdrawals and deposits.

6.         All documents relating to foreign and domestic credit, debit, ATM or charge accounts over which the taxpayer had or other authority or over which the taxpayer exercised control for the year, including, but not limited to:

            a. original cards (The IRS will make a copy of each card and return it to the taxpayer)

            b. card applications (regardless of date)

            c. agreements (regardless of date)

            d. customer relationship records or other similar record identifying persons with signatory authority or other authority over the account (regardless of date)

            e. monthly or periodic charge statements

            f. charge receipts

            g. cash advance confirmations

            h. payments or funds transferred for balances due

            i. electronic payment and/or transfer records 

7. For each foreign bank account, in any name, over which the taxpayer had signature other authority and/or over which the taxpayer exercised control, during the year, produce all documents from such bank informing you that your account information was subject to an exchange of information request with the United States government. If you received such a notice, state whether you signed a waiver or consent permitting disclosure of your account information to the IRS.     

C.        BROKERAGE OR SECURITIES ACCOUNTS 

1.         For each brokerage or securities account, in any name, whether foreign or domestic, over which the taxpayer had signature, dealer or other authority or which the taxpayer controlled, either directly or through nominees, agents, powers of attorney, letters of direction, or any device whatsoever, during the year produce all documents in the taxpayer’s possession, custody or control or to which the taxpayer had right of access for the period January 1 through December 31 of the year, including but not limited to:

            a. account application (regardless of date)

            b. signature cards (regardless of date)

            c. monthly or periodic account statements

            d. annual account statements

            e. wire transfer authorizations and confirmations

            f. all correspondence, including but not limited to, letters, memoranda, telegrams, telexes, e-mail, and letters of instruction,

            g. memorandum files maintained by the brokerage firm or any of their officers or employees, reflecting communications between the firm, their officers, or employees and the taxpayer or others acting on the taxpayer’s behalf, documenting actions taken pursuant to directions received from the taxpayer or on the taxpayer’s behalf, and reflecting any thoughts or decisions of any person regarding the account

            h. documents verifying the origin of all funds deposited in the account

            i. know-your-customer KYC) files or other similar records maintained for anti-money laundering purposes (regardless of date), including but not limited to account set up documents, identification documents such as passports, driver’s licenses, opening deposit slips, certificates of beneficial ownership, letters of reference, certificates of clean funds and other source of funds documentation 

D.     OWNERSHIP

 1.         For each entity or structure, foreign or domestic (including but not limited to all foundations, stiftungs, anstalts, and/or other legal entities) in which the taxpayer exercised control and/or held an ownership interest, legal interest, fiduciary interest, and/or beneficial interest at any time during the year, provide all documents relating to each entity or structure, including but not limited to:

            a. organizational documents, deeds of incorporation. by-laws, registrations (regardless of date)

            b. ownership documents including those reflecting the taxpayer’s percentage of legal ownership. percentage of beneficial ownership, and all changes in ownership (regardless of date)

            c. operational and business documents

            d. financial statements 

2.         For each entity or structure identified, provide all books and records for the year, including, but not limited to:

            a. monthly or periodic bank statements, general ledgers

            b. articles of incorporation

            c. memoranda of association

            d. stock record book

            e. minute book

            f. partnership agreements

            g. trust instruments and other formation documents

            h. documents designating beneficiaries

            i. documents designating trustees

            j. documents designating protectors

            k. documents designating partners

            1. documents designating percentage ownership

            m. contracts and agreements

            n. records of brokerage or other investment accounts

            o. records of assets and liabilities

            p. powers of attorney, letters of wishes, letters of direction, or other similar documents granting authority to agents to act on behalf of the entity

q. correspondence files

r. documents under “mail to be kept at the bank” agreements

s. safe deposit boxes

            t. correspondence to or from the legal entity

u. organizational charts

v. orders to change representation or for cancellation of the ega entity

w. internal notes and memoranda referencing any aspect of the legal entity, founder, and/or beneficiary(s)

x. last will and testament and all estate planning documents, whether superceded or not, of the founder and al beneficiaries 

3.         For each entity or structure identified, provide all documents distributed, sent, and/or transmitted by or to any legal, fiduciary and/or beneficial owners to and from professionals

            (e.g., attorneys, accountants, bankers, trust advisors, etc.) including, but not limited to contracts, agreements, advisories, schedules, letters, memoranda, notes and instructions. 

4.         For each entity or structure identified, provide the name, address and telephone number of the person(s)controlling the assets of the entity or structure during the year. 

5.         All written contracts, agreements, letters, memoranda, notes, statements, and all other documents of the year pertaining to the assignment and transfer of ownership interest in and rights to use of real, personal or intangible property by or for the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s benefit. 

6.         All powers of attorney giving the taxpayer authority to act on behalf of any person or entity, foreign or domestic, during the year. 

7.         All powers of attorney executed by the taxpayer giving another the authority to act on the taxpayer’s behalf or on behalf of any person or entity, whether foreign or domestic over which the taxpayer exercises control, during the year. 

8.         All certificates of beneficial ownership, stock certificates, including bearer shares or other similar evidences of ownership in owned by the taxpayer at any time during the year with respect to any foreign trust, corporation, foundation, international business company, or similar entity.

9.         Provide all records, returns, information related to foreign joint venture profit participation from inception to current. 

E.    NON-TAXABLE SOURCES OF INCOME

1.         All records pertaining to any non-taxable sources of income, including, but not limited to, proceeds of loans, gifts, inheritances, insurance settlements, tax refunds, and tax-exempt interest the taxpayer received for year.

            a. For each loan whether commercial or private, made or obtained by the taxpayer or on the taxpayer’s behalf during the year or which was in existence during the year, provide all documents evidencing the terms and performance of the transaction, including, but not limited to:

                        1. loan applications (regardless of date)

                        2. loan agreements and contracts (regardless of date)

                        3. loan amortization schedules (regardless of date)

                        4. promissory notes

                        5. grant deeds, deeds of trust, mortgages, or other security

6.documents showing disbursement of the loan proceeds (e.g., wire transfer authorization)

                        7. records of receipt of principal and interest

                        8. records of payment of principal and interest 

F.       TRAVEL 

1.         All of the taxpayer’s original U.S. passports, both current and expired.

2.         All of the taxpayer’s original foreign passports, both current and expired.

3.         All records of foreign travel during the year, including, but not limited to, commercial transportation, private leasing, and vehicles/aircraft/boats owned by the taxpayer. 

G. PROFESSIONALS 

1.         All financial statements prepared by the taxpayer, for the taxpayer, or on the taxpayer’s behalf for any purpose during and/or for the year.

2.         Provide the name, address, telephone number of each private banker, broker, trust advisor, investment or other financial advisor. advisor on privacy matters, lawyer and accountant from whom the taxpayer received advice or services during the year.

3.         All business cards for attorneys, paralegals, consultants, accountants, and/or other professionals in the taxpayer’s possession and/or within the taxpayer’s control during year.

4.         All records relating to any payments in the year 2008 by or for the benefit of the taxpayer or any non-publically traded entity, foreign or domestic, in which the taxpayer held a direct or indirect ownership or beneficial interest or over which the taxpayer exercised control. either directly or through a nominee, agent, power of attorney, letter of direction, letter of wishes, or any device whatsoever, for:

            a. management fees

            b. consulting fees

            c. research and development fees

            d. legal fees

            e. brokerage fees

            f other personal service fees

            g. salaries or wages

            h. insurance premiums

            i. royalties

            j. lease or rental fees

            k. loan fees

            l. interest

The foregoing records should include, but are not limited to:

            a. contracts or agreements

            b. invoices

            c. cancelled checks

            d. wire transfers

            e. letters of credit

            f. all correspondence 

5.         Identify all professional, social and civic organizations the taxpayer has been a member of from January 1 of the year to present. Include in your response the following:

            a. name, telephone number and current address of the organization

            b. dates of membership

            c. offices held (and dates)

            d. membership number or other identifying numbers (e.g., State Bar Numbers, CPA ID numbers) 

6.         If the taxpayer is a member of an organization with and oversight committee or disciplinary board, identify any complaints filed against you. including;

            a. name and address of the complainant (if anonymous, so indicate)

            b. date of complaint

            c. copy of your written response

            d. disposition or result of investigation

            e. date and location of any hearing, including the tribunal you appeared before

            f. copy of your written response

            g. disposition or result of investigation 

In responding to the foregoing offshore Account IDR, the following instructions are provided:

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THIS REQUEST-READ CAREFULLY

1.                     The term “document(s) is used in the broadest sense and includes all attachments. Document(s) includes any written, typed, photo static, recorded or otherwise visually reproduced communications or presentations, whether comprised of letters, words, numbers, pictures, sounds, symbols, or any combination thereof. Document(s) refers to all written, printed, typed, graphically, visually or aurally reproduced material of any kind, or other means of preserving thought or expression, and all tangible things from which information can be processed or transcribed. Further, “documents” include, but are not limited to:

a. Items designated as internal, confidential, ”not to be disclosed” or private;

            b. All electronic mail (e-mail), whether on an electronic disk and/or any other system or device which saves emails, attachments, links; and

            c. Videotapes, audiotapes, CDs, cassettes, DVDs, films, flash drives (memory sticks, etc.), microfilm, computer files, computer discs, computer programs and other electronic media.

2.         If a document has been prepared in several copies, or additional copies have been made, and the copies are not identical (or, by reason of subsequent modification or notation, are no longer identical), each non-identical copy is a separate “document.”

3.         The taxpayer has “possession, custody, or control” if the taxpayer has actual or constructive possession of the document and/or can access the document upon inquiry and/or through a legal right to obtain the document including, but not limited to, responsive documents in the possession, custody, or control of taxpayer’s lawyer(s),accountant(s), banker(s), advisor(s), and/or trust advisor(s).

4.         All responsive documents in the taxpayer’s possession, custody or control should be provided, as well as all documents, in the possession, custody, or control of the taxpayer’s agents, employees, and/or representatives, including but not limited to , responsive documents in the possession, custody or control of taxpayer’s lawyer(s), accountant(s), advisors, and/or trust advisor(s).

5.         If any responsive document was, but is no longer, in taxpayer’s possession, custody or control, state what disposition was made of it, the reason for such disposition and who has possession or control of the document.

6.         The term “taxpayer” means the individual under audit. The term “taxpayer” also means all foreign or domestic entities or structures over which the individual taxpayer exercises control including, but not limited to, corporations, partnerships, associations, limited liability companies, trusts, estates, foundations, escrows, charitable foundations, banks, and nominees.

7.         A taxpayer can “exercise control” by acting directly or indirectly. Indirect control includes, but is not limited to, the use of nominees, agents, powers of attorney, protectors, advisors, trusts, letter of wishes, by-laws, letters of direction, or any device whatsoever.

8.         The taxpayer has “signature or other authority” over an account if the taxpayer can control the disposition of money or other property in the account by delivery of a document containing the taxpayer’s signature-either alone or with the signature of other person(s) and/or with code word(s) and/or code name(s)-to the bank or other person with whom the account is maintained, or if the taxpayer can exercise comparable authority over the account by direct or indirect communication with the bank or other person with whom the account is maintained, either orally or by some other means.

9.         If the taxpayer claims a “privilege’ for any document responsive to any request, or any part of such document, specify:

            a. name and title of the author;

            b. date appearing on such document or, if undated, the date or approximate dates such document was created;

            c. name and title of each addressee and of each recipients of the document and/or copies thereto;

            d. subject matter of the document;

            e. name and address of each persons having present possession, custody, or control of such document and/or copies thereof;

            f. privilege or protection claimed; and

            g. number of the request(s) to which production of the document would otherwise be responsive.

10.       If you do not have-one or more of the requested items or do not know the answer to one or more of the questions asked, but you know who does, please state the name, address, and phone number or other contact information for each such person in your response to the request or question. 

Detailed responses to detailed requests for information often generate additional detailed requests for information. As such, offshore account IDRs typically conclude with the admonition that additional years and items can be added as audit issue(s), and additional records or documents may be requested as the examination progresses. Further, taxpayer’s are cautioned to retain all potentially relevant and previously requested records or documents until the examination is concluded. 

Taxpayers having previously undisclosed interests in foreign financial accounts should immediately consider methods of becoming compliant. There is no better time to prepare for a later examination than when the documents are being drafted and executed. Files for relevant documents and schedules should be coordinated with a view towards accelerating any later examination. If the transaction has any unique concerns, those issues should be well documented. It is sometimes difficult to later recall why documents were drafted in a certain manner or with unique provisions. 

During the examination, the IRS may require responses within a relatively short timeframe (often less than 30 days since most such examinations are being worked as part of a larger examination project focused on foreign financial institutions and their accountholders). If documents are not readily available, make that fact known in advance. 

The standardized offshore account IDR may cause the practitioner to wonder about their ability to effectively respond as well as their ethical responsibilities. Upon request by the IRS, practitioners must promptly submit non-privileged records & information to the IRS, notify the IRS of the location of requested records & information in possession of others, and make reasonable inquiries of the taxpayer regarding the location of requested records & information in possession of others.[i] Further, a practitioner may not unreasonably delay the prompt disposition of any matter before the IRS. [ii] 

Competent counsel must be consulted before the examination begins since sensitive tax issues permeate an examination of any taxpayer having previously undisclosed interests in a foreign financial account or foreign assets. How can any practitioner promptly and effectively respond to an offshore account IDR that requests everything imaginable with respect to the domestic and foreign activities of what are likely high wealth taxpayers having numerous domestic and foreign related entities? Neither the taxpayer nor the IRS have any desire to unnecessarily prolong the examination process. Initially, the practitioner should coordinate a meeting with the examiner to determine whether it might be possible to streamline the examination process, being careful about obvious sensitive issues. Is it possible to determine whether the examination will be resolved in a purely civil manner without a referral for criminal investigation? That may be the purpose of the examination. 

The practitioner’s duty of representation to the client must be balanced with the effort to reasonably cooperate with the examination process. The practitioner should attempt to reasonably limit the scope of the inquiry and limit the information provided so as to avoid the waiver of any potential privileges. If matters are privileged, the correspondence and relevant files should be appropriately labeled. Be aware of any potential privileges that may apply and make sure not to inadvertently waive any privilege. Separate files should be maintained for relevant documents that might be requested by the IRS as well as documents that contain potentially confidential, privileged information. It is important to know exactly which documents are deemed important to the IRS. Copies of documents provided during the course of the examination should be made in duplicate – one copy for the IRS and an extra copy to be maintained in a separate audit file specifically identifying documents provided during the course of the examination. 

It is generally advisable to attempt to resolve any examination at the earliest opportunity. However, the design of foreign account examinations mostly precludes any ability for a prompt resolution. Practitioners must respect the nature of these examinations and exercise discretion and their best judgment in responding (or not) to each request for information. The IRS has expended considerable resources rooting out non-compliant taxpayers having previously undisclosed interests in foreign financial accounts. IRS has determined that such taxpayers represent a compliance challenge worthy of devoting substantial enforcement resources.  Taxpayers and their representatives must be prepared to respond in kind. 

Compliance, compliance, compliance. Those with interests in foreign accounts that have not previously been disclosed should immediately consult competent tax counsel about coming into compliance. The ability of a U.S. taxpayer to maintain an undisclosed, “secret” foreign financial account is fast becoming nonexistent. Foreign account information is flowing into the IRS under tax treaties, through submissions by whistleblowers, and from others who participated in the OVDP and the OVDI identifying their banks, bankers, advisors and others. Additional information will become available as the FATCA[iii] and Foreign Financial Asset Reporting (new Code § 6038D) become effective in the next few years. 

The criminal “pre-clearance” OVDP/OVDI voluntary disclosure process of submitting the taxpayer’s name, address, date of birth and taxpayer identification number to Criminal Investigation is expected to remain available indefinitely. Representatives of numerous taxpayers having undisclosed interests in foreign financial accounts will continue to contact Criminal Investigation although there is no certainty in any potential civil resolution of the issues involved. However, likely far more taxpayers may not come forward out of concern that the IRS might assert FBAR (and other offshore related) penalties of up to 50% of the high account balance, per year. Some will undoubtedly decide to risk detection by the IRS and the imposition of substantial penalties, including the civil fraud penalty, numerous foreign information return penalties, and the potential risk of criminal prosecution. 

Many taxpayers will decide to submit a voluntary disclosure based on a personal desire to come into compliance now that they are aware of the FBAR and other foreign account reporting requirements. Others will recognize an opportunity to repatriate stagnant foreign funds into a domestic recessionary economy or may simply want to move on with their lives. Practitioners should continue to respect the value to our system of tax administration founded upon IRS and Department of Justice voluntary disclosure practice and policies as well as the ongoing governmental international tax enforcement efforts within a shrinking global community. 

This is a target rich environment for the government. The IRS is committed to enforcement concerning offshore accounts and can be expected to continually enhance these efforts. The changing environment concerning bank secrecy will continue to uncover overly optimistic U.S. persons. However, the IRS simply will not be able to locate the vast majority of foreign account holders through enforcement efforts alone. The voluntary disclosure practices of the IRS and the Department of Justice are designed to encourage non-compliant taxpayers to come forward into compliance. 

Our system of tax administration requires a perception of fairness and respect for those who make a voluntary, conscious decision to come into compliance before being contacted about their previous tax indiscretions. Accordingly, it can be anticipated that the IRS will continue to “draw a clear line between those individual taxpayers with offshore accounts who voluntarily come forward to get right with the government and those who continue to fail to meet their tax obligations. People who come in voluntarily will get a fair settlement . . . For taxpayers who continue to hide their head in the sand, the situation will only become more dire. They should come forward now under [the] voluntary disclosure practice and get right with the government.”[iv] Coming into past compliance through a voluntary disclosure, or at least prospective compliance, is the right thing to do. Waiting is simply not a viable option . . .   

 

 

_____________________________________________


[i].              Treasury Department Circular No. 230 (CIR 230), Regulations Governing the Practice of Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents, Enrolled Actuaries, Enrolled Retirement Plan Agents, and Appraisers before the Internal Revenue Service,  §10.20

[ii].             CIR 230 §10.23

 

[iii] See “FATCA and Foreign Bank Accounts: Has the U.S. Overreached?” by Scott D. Michel and H. David Rosenbloom, (Tax Analysts Viewpoints, May 30, 2011).

[iv] IRS Commissioner Douglas H. Shulman, March 26, 2009

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice

Since 1952, practitioners are unaware of any situation where the IRS has referred a timely, truthful and complete voluntary disclosure to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. A truthful, timely and complete voluntary disclosure is a factor considered in the IRS decision re a possible criminal prosecution referral to the U.S. Department of Justice. [i] The taxpayer must fully cooperate with the government, make good faith arrangements to pay any tax, interest, and penalties determined to be applicable, and must disclose every aspect of noncompliance. [ii] 

The voluntary disclosure practice of the IRS and the Department of Justice are designed to encourage non-compliant taxpayers to come forward into compliance. Our system of tax administration requires a perception of fairness and respect for those who make a voluntary, conscious decision to come into compliance before being contacted about their previous tax indiscretions. The various offshore voluntary disclosure programs of 2009 OVDP and the 2011/2012 OVDI represent a formalization of the historic voluntary disclosure practice in effect for limited taxpayers and for a limited time frame. These initiatives provided an important opportunity for the government to publically demonstrate the benefits to taxpayer’s voluntarily coming into compliance.

Historically, a disclosure is timely if it is received before the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation of the taxpayer, or has notified the taxpayer that it intends to commence such an examination or investigation; the IRS has received information from a third party (e.g., informant, other governmental agency, or the media) alerting the IRS to the specific taxpayer’s noncompliance; the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation which is directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer; or  the IRS has acquired information directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer from a criminal enforcement action (e.g., search warrant, grand jury subpoena). Importantly, the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice describes a voluntary disclosure to include:

(6) Examples of voluntary disclosures include:  a.  a letter from an attorney which encloses amended returns from a client which are complete and accurate (reporting legal source income omitted from the original returns), which offers to pay the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable in full and which meets the timeliness standard set forth above.  This is a voluntary disclosure because all elements . . . above are met.[iii]

The Department of Justice maintains a voluntary disclosure policy that provides:

Whenever a person voluntarily discloses that he or she committed a crime before any investigation of the person’s conduct begins, that factor is considered by the Tax Division along with all other factors in the case in determining whether to pursue criminal prosecution. If a putative criminal defendant has complied in all respects with all of the requirements of the Internal Revenue Service’s voluntary disclosure practice, the Tax Division may consider that factor in its exercise of prosecutorial discretion. It will consider, inter alia, the timeliness of the voluntary disclosure, what prompted the person to make the disclosure, and whether the person fully and truthfully cooperated with the government by paying past tax liabilities, complying with subsequent tax obligations, and assisting in the prosecution of other persons involved in the crime. [iv] 

Further, the Department’s Policy Directives and Memoranda provides:

. . . the Service’s voluntary disclosure policy remains, as it has since 1952, an exercise of prosecutorial discretion that does not, and legally could not, confer any legal rights on taxpayers. If the Service has referred a case to the Division, it is reasonable and appropriate to assume that the Service has considered any voluntary disclosure claims made by the taxpayer and has referred the case to the Division in a manner consistent with its public statements and internal policies. As a result, our review is normally confined to the merits of the case and the application of the Department’s voluntary disclosure policy set forth in Section 4.01 of the Criminal Tax Manual.[v] 

Taxpayers submitting a voluntary disclosure as well as those who “opt-out” of the 2009 OVDP or the 2011 OVDI remain within IRS Criminal Investigation’s Voluntary Disclosure Practice. Therefore, they are still required to cooperate fully with any following examination by providing all requested information and records and must pay or make arrangements to pay the tax, interest, and penalties they are ultimately determined to be due. If a taxpayer does not cooperate or make payment arrangements, their matter may be referred back to Criminal Investigation. The opt-out decision should follow an extremely careful consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances that may adversly impact the taxpayer as a result. Benefits from opting out are, at best, far from certain.


[i]  IRM 9.5.11.9 (June 26, 2009)

[ii] Id.

[iii] Id. See also the Criminal Information in United States v. Schiavo, Case 1:11-cr-10192-RGS-1 (USDC Mass, May 19, 2011) regarding the prosecution of a taxpayer for quietly filing a false amended return disclosing earnings on a foreign account but failing to disclose the underlying income deposited into the foreign account (¶ 11.A “silent disclosure” occurs when a U.S. taxpayer with an undeclared account files FBARs and amended returns and pays any related tax and interest for previously unreported offshore income without notifying the IRS of the undeclared account through the Voluntary Disclosure Program. A silent disclosure does not constitute a voluntary disclosure. On its website, the IRS strongly encourages taxpayers to come forward under the Voluntary Disclosure Program and warns them that taxpayers who instead make silent disclosures risk being criminally prosecuted for all applicable years. ¶ 18. On or about October 6, 2009, following widespread media coverage of UBS’s disclosure to the IRS of account records for undeclared accounts held by U.S. taxpayers and the IRS’s Voluntary Disclosure Program, Schiavo made a “silent disclosure” by preparing and filing FBARs and amended Forms 1040 for tax years 2003 to 2008, in which he reported the existence of his previously undeclared account at HSBC Bank Bermuda. He made such filings notwithstanding the availability of the Voluntary Disclosure Program. Schaivo reported on the amended individual income tax returns the interest income that he earned from the previously undeclared account he held at HSBC Bank Bermuda but did not report on the 2006 return the income earned that he earned from Headway Partners. ¶ 19. On or about October 27, 2009, a Special Agent from the IRS attempted to interview Schiavo at his home. ¶ 20. On or about October 29,2009, Schiavo prepared and executed a second amended individual income tax return for tax year 2006 on which he reported the income earned that he earned from Headway Partners and that had been deposited into his previously undeclared account at HSBC Bank Bermuda.).

[iv] Section 4.01, Criminal Tax Manual, U.S. Department of Justice (2008)

[v]  Section 3, Policy Directives and Memoranda, Tax Division, U.S. Department of Justice (02/17/1993)

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

Overview of FBAR Reporting Requirements

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

Qualified Amended Returns Can Eliminate Accuracy Related Tax Penalty

Improved tax compliance requires taxpayers (and those who ought to be taxpayers) to voluntarily come into compliance. When errors are discovered in a filed return, tax practitioners often pave the road to compliance through assurances that the tax-equivalent of water-boarding is not a typical government response to receipt of an amended return. Some assurances are purportedly provided in Treasury Regulation (Treas. Reg.) §1.6664-2(c)(2) relating to the timely filing of a Qualified Amended Return (QAR). Generally, the QAR Regulations are intended to encourage voluntary compliance by permitting taxpayers to avoid accuracy-related penalties if an amended return is filed before the IRS begins an investigation of the taxpayer or the promoter of a transaction in which the taxpayer participated.

Penalties Based on “Underpayment” of Tax. Internal Revenue Code (Code) §§ 6662(a) and (b) provide for a 20% penalty on an “underpayment” resulting from negligence, a “substantial understatement of income tax”, a substantial valuation misstatement, a substantial overstatement of pension liabilities, or a substantial estate or gift tax valuation overstatement.[i]  Code § 6663 provides for a 75% civil fraud penalty on the portion of any “underpayment” attributable to fraud. For purposes of Code §§ 6662 and 6663, an “underpayment” is defined in Code § 6664 and the regulations as the difference between the correct amount of tax (determined without regard to payments and credits) and the “amount shown as the tax by the taxpayer on his return” (including amounts previously assessed and credits or refunds received). [ii] 

Qualified Amended Return and the Civil Fraud Exception. Under certain situations, a timely filed an amended return may reduce or eliminate accuracy-related penalties. The “amount shown as the tax by the taxpayer on his return” includes an amount shown as additional tax on a QAR, except that such amount is not included if it relates to a fraudulent position on the original return.[iii]  Treas. Reg. § 6664-2(c)(3) provides that a QAR is an amended return, or a timely request under Code § 6227 (regarding a request for an administrative adjustment of partnership items), filed after the due date of the original return for the specific tax year (determined with regard to extensions) and before the earliest of— 

(A). The date the taxpayer is first contacted by the IRS concerning any examination (including a criminal investigation) with respect to the return. Note that the contact must be by the IRS; a QAR can be filed if the taxpayers has not been contacted by the IRS even though they were contacted by others. Also, the IRS contact must be “with respect to the return.” An initial IRS contact does not always identify the exact reason for the contact. Also,  a contact for one tax year should not bar the filing of a QAR for a different tax year; 

(B). The date any person is first contacted by the IRS concerning an examination of that person under Code § 6700 (relating to the penalty for promoting abusive tax shelters) for an activity with respect to which the taxpayer claimed any tax benefit on the return directly or indirectly through the entity, plan or arrangement described in Code § 6700(a)(1)(A). Contacts of a promoter under Code § 6700 must be examined to determine whether such promoter was a “person” contacted concerning the taxpayers’ particular transaction. Consistent with its promoter strategy, the Service has initiated a significant number of promoter examinations to obtain (among other objectives) tax shelter client lists. The IRS frequently conducts examinations under Code § 6707 (failure to register penalty) and  Code § 6708 (failure to maintain investor list penalty), not under Code §  6700 (promoting abusive tax shelters)[iv]

(C). With respect to a pass-through item[v], the date the pass-through entity[vi] is first contacted by the IRS in connection with an examination of the return to which the pass-through item relates. Practitioners should determine whether any such contacts were “in connection with an examination of the return to which the pass-through item relates.” A contact for one tax year should not bar the filing of a QAR for a different tax year; 

(D).  The date on which the IRS serves a “John Doe” summons[vii] relating to the tax liability of a person, group, or class that includes the taxpayer (or pass-through entity of which the taxpayer is a partner, shareholder, beneficiary, or holder of a residual interest in a REMIC) with respect to an activity for which the taxpayer directly or indirectly claimed any tax benefit on the return. The foregoing applies to any return claiming a direct or indirect tax benefit from the type of activity that is the subject of the John Doe summons, regardless of whether the summons seeks the production of information for the taxable period covered by such return. This represents a distinction from the requirements relating to individual returns and partnership items for particular tax years; and 

(E).  The date on which the IRS announces by revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement, to be published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, a settlement initiative to compromise or waive penalties, in whole or in part, with respect to a “listed transaction”. The foregoing only applies to a taxpayer who participated in the listed transaction and for the tax year(s) in which the taxpayer claimed any direct or indirect tax benefits from the listed transaction. Essentially, once the IRS announces an administrative settlement for a listed transaction, the taxpayer can no longer obtain penalty relief through the filing of a QAR[viii] 

A QAR effectively eliminates accuracy-related penalties, by removing amounts shown on the amended return from the penalty calculation. Significantly, even if timely, an amended return does not qualify as a QAR if the tax deficiencies that are corrected in the amended return relate to a fraudulent position on the original return. Why? Taxpayers should be encouraged to voluntarily amend all returns, even returns that for some reason may be deemed to include fraudulent positions, before the occurrence of any of the events set forth in Treas. Reg. § 6664-2(c)(3). Historically, the IRS rarely examined amended returns setting forth a deficiency. The IRS is presently conducting examinations of good faith QARs and is aggressively seeking interviews of the taxpayer, the return preparer and others. What is an appropriate interview response as to the reason a taxpayer decided to amend a return and report an additional tax liability? Patriotism? Sleep therapy? Should we care? 

It is not recommended that practitioners routinely allow the IRS to interview the taxpayer. The taxpayer’s representative may represent the taxpayer in an examination and is not required to produce the taxpayer for questioning, unless an administrative summons is served on the taxpayer.[ix] Agents typically seek to interview taxpayers near the commencement of an examination.  Unfortunately, at that time the representative typically does not have sufficient information to determine the nature and scope of the examination. IRS examinations are typically focused and occur because of a specific reason. Determining that reason, especially following the good faith filing of a QAR, is the foundation of every representation. 

Practitioners can not effectively represent their clients without knowing the nature and scope of any examination. During every examination involving an amended return (and otherwise), consider submission of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)[x] request seeking a copy of the IRS administrative file, which would include the internal memoranda and documents prepared by the examining agent or received from third parties. In the event the IRS Disclosure Office might determine that an exemption applies to some or all of the requested information, the FOIA request should include a request that a privilege log be provided in the form of a Vaughn Index.[xi] There may be meaningful surprises lurking within the FOIA response. Also, request information regarding any third parties the IRS may have contacted at any time regarding the examination of the taxpayer.[xii]  

Efficient tax administration should seek to encourage, rather than restrict, the filing of QAR in a resource-challenged environment. Taxpayers and practitioners must carefully consider whether submission of a good faith QAR is actually in the best interest of the taxpayer. Code § 6664 and Treas. Reg. § 6664-2 specifically preclude the IRS from asserting the Code § 6662 accuracy-related penalties following the filing of a timely QAR. The informal IRS voluntary disclosure practice mostly precludes a criminal referral to the Department of Justice if a taxpayer has come into compliance in a timely manner.[xiii]  Although the IRS has the burden of proving civil fraud by clear and convincing evidence, taxpayers must now be advised that it can be anticipated that the IRS will use the purported QAR as a roadmap in attempting to determine whether to assert the 75% fraud penalty under Code § 6663. Examinations of QARs for the stated or unstated purpose of determining a civil fraud penalty are simply inappropriate and do anything but promote the desired perception of the fairness of tax administration within the United States. 

Examinations of amended returns are appropriate if to determine the accuracy of the amended return. However, the current QAR examinations are targeting items reflected on the original return that were changed in the amended return for the sole purpose of determining the possibility of a civil fraud penalty. The government should graciously accept the amended return and payment of the tax and interest deficiencies, determine whether it is substantially accurate, and thank the taxpayer for their contribution to the continued operations of the U.S. government. It is not good policy to shoot the fish in the barrel simply because the others are more difficult to catch. 

As a result of RRA ‘98, we should have learned that inappropriately allocated enforcement resources may only serve to foster future non-compliance. If your neighbor filed a good faith QAR and then had to defend a civil fraud examination associated with the originally filed return there is no chance you or others would similarly consider filing a QAR. Those who amend returns in a timely and voluntary manner should be treated fairly and with respect. Burning down the village in an effort to save it is bad policy for future tax compliance. 

The complexity found within the Code will long continue to be a significant problem for effective tax administration. We live in a country founded by smugglers and those resisting the exercise of government powers in England. Inappropriately asserting penalties will not improve tax compliance. Penalties only impact those who are actually penalized. Notwithstanding a strong, wide-ranging international enforcement effort and an increasingly significant possibility of detection and potential punishment, enforcement efforts alone will not reduce the Tax Gap. Fairness or at least the perception of fairness in enforcement will have a significant impact on the future of tax compliance in the United States. Compliant taxpayers and supportive practitioners will reduce the Tax Gap. 

Taxpayers who are aware of questionable issues within their returns and are not presently under examination should seriously consider filing a QAR to avoid the exposure to the accuracy-related penalties. When representing a taxpayer considering or following submission of a good faith QAR, the representative should proceed with extreme caution. Next time they ask Who’s the chump?”make sure it is not while defending the assertion of a civil fraud penalty on behalf of a taxpayer who attempted to come into compliance by timely filing a good faith QAR….

________________________________

 


[i].          Under Code §6662(h), this penalty can increase to 40% of an underpayment if a taxpayer’s adjusted basis is grossly misstated (i.e., overstated by 400% or more). In many tax shelter transactions, an asset’s basis can become “enhanced” by more than 400%, and the IRS has been proposing the 40% penalty.               

[ii].          Code §6664(a) and Treas. Reg. §§ 1.6664-2(a), (b) and (c).

[iii].         Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.6664-2(c)(2).

[iv].            Bergmann v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-289 (February 16, 2009).

[v].         See Treas. Reg. §1.6662–4(f)(5).

[vi].         See Treas. Reg. §1.6662–4(f)(5).

 

[vii].        See Code §  7609(f). A “John Doe” summons does not identify the specific person with respect to whose liability the summons is issued but must relate to the investigation of a particular person or an ascertainable group.

[viii].       Treas. Reg. § 6664-2(c)(3).

[ix].         Code § 7521(c).

[x].         5 U.S.C. §552

[xi].            In Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974), the court rejected an agency’s conclusory affidavit stating that requested FOIA documents were subject to exemption. Id. at 828. “A Vaughn Index must: (1) identify each document withheld; (2) state the statutory exemption claimed; and (3) explain how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption.” Citizens Comm’n on Human Rights v. FDA, 45 F.3d 1325, 1326 n.1 (9th Cir. 1995). A Vaughn Index ” ‘permit[s] the court system effectively and efficiently to evaluate the factual nature of disputed information.’ ” John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146, 149 n.2 (1989) (quoting Vaughn, 484 F.2d at 826).

[xii].        See Code §7602(c).

[xiii].       See Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) 9.5.11.9 (June 26, 2009) available at irs.gov

Posted by: Taxlitigator.com | January 11, 2012

FOIA Requests: A Look Into the IRS Examination File

Practitioners should consider submission of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)[i] request to the IRS following the unagreed resolution of every tax examination. Although not always a wealth of information, the government response to a FOIA request will provide insight into why the examining agent made certain adjustments and asserted penalties. It will also help tailor your discussions before an IRS Appeals Officer at the next administrative level and provide insight into what the Appeals Officer will be looking at before meeting with the practitioner. Often, the FOIA response will include the agents notes and thoughts which may prove invaluable in later explaining why the matter was not resolved (or capable of resolution) during the initial examination. 

The FOIA requires that federal agency records be made available to the public unless specifically required or permitted to be withheld. If information is not prohibited from disclosure, an IRS Disclosure Officer must consider whether, as an exercise of administrative discretion, the information should be released or withheld. Any IRS discretionary decision to release information protected under the FOIA should be made only after considering the institutional (i.e., public accountability, safeguarding national security, law enforcement effectiveness, and candid and complete deliberations), commercial, and personal privacy interests that could be implicated by disclosure of the information. 

The form in which IRS maintains a record does not affect its availability. A request may seek a printed or typed document, tape recording, map, photograph, computer printout, computer tape or disk, or a similar item. The IRS must provide the requested information in any format requested if it is readily reproducible by the IRS in that format and must make reasonable efforts to maintain its information in formats that are reproducible for such purposes. Generally, there is no charge for the first 100 pages and $ 0.20 per page thereafter. 

The IRS is only required to look for an existing record or document in response to a FOIA request. FOIA does not require the IRS to collect information it does not have, or to research or analyze data for a requester. The IRS is not obliged to create a new record to comply with a FOIA request. However, when records are maintained in a computer, the IRS may be required to retrieve information in response to a FOIA request. The process of retrieving the information may result in the creation of a new document when the data is printed out on paper or written on computer tape or disk. 

Form of FOIA request. There is no required form FOIA request. It can be an informal letter requesting each and every document contained in the administrative files of the government relating to the tax liabilities of the taxpayer for the tax years at issue. IRS FOIA requests should be submitted to the IRS Disclosure Office based on the location of the taxpayer. IRS Disclosure Offices are listed at www.irs.gov (Search FOIA). The request should identify the documents as specifically as possible. A general form of FOIA request, addressed to the appropriate IRS Disclosure Office, should be tailored to the specific client situation involved and state substantially as follows: 

We represent [Client] and have attached an Internal Revenue Service Power of Attorney (Form 2848) confirming the foregoing.  This letter is intended to formally request, under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, each and every document (exclusive of the filed tax income tax returns) contained in the administrative files of the Internal Revenue Service relating to the individual income tax liabilities of [Client)] (TIN 123456789) for taxable years (state the tax years). 

This request does not include copies of the foregoing tax returns, nor does it include copies of correspondence generated by our office.  Subject to the foregoing, the requested information includes, but is not limited to: 

1.                     The Examination Division Administrative File for the audit.  This information should include any worksheets, workpapers, notes, emails, documents, memoranda, computations and other materials prepared or accumulated relative to this examination by employees of the IRS, any other governmental agency, or otherwise, including internal documents, memoranda, memoranda of all interviews of persons regarding the individual income tax liabilities of the taxpayer, copies of all statements (sworn or otherwise) given by individuals in connection with the investigation of the individual income tax liabilities of the taxpayer, Case Activity record, written reports and recommendations concerning the proposed assessment of additional tax and penalties and any other information that is related to the determinations by the IRS as set forth in the Revenue Agents Report  (30 Day Letter). 

2.                     A list of any information and documents maintained electronically identifying each document by subject matter and format (i.e., tape, disk, etc.). 

3.                     Any and all files relative to this audit that include information and documents obtained pursuant to summonses issued to third parties which are not otherwise included in the Administrative File. 

4.                     Any and all files relative to this audit that may have been prepared by independent consultants, international examiners, economists, engineers, and any other  specialists assigned to this case which are not otherwise included in the Administrative File. 

5.                     We have determined that the information requested is not exempt under disclosure laws, is not a classified document, is not a protected internal communication, is not protected by “privacy”, and is not a “protected investigative record” within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act. If any material is deemed to be exempt, we hereby request a detailed statement of the portion deleted or withheld, a full statement of the reasons for the refusal or access, and specific citations or statutory authority for the denial. Specifically, if the Disclosure Section determines an exemption applies to some or all of the requested information, we request that a Privilege Log be provided in the form of a Vaughn Index.   In Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974), the court rejected an agency’s conclusory affidavit stating that requested FOIA documents were subject to exemption. Id. at 828. “A Vaughn Index must: (1) identify each document withheld; (2) state the statutory exemption claimed; and (3) explain how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption.” Citizens Comm’n on Human Rights v. FDA, 45 F.3d 1325, 1326 n.1 (9th Cir. 1995). A Vaughn Index ” ‘permit[s] the court system effectively and efficiently to evaluate the factual nature of disputed information.’ “ John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146, 149 n.2 (1989) (quoting Vaughn, 484 F.2d at 826). With a Vaughn Index we will have the means to adequately assess if any claimed exemptions have merit thereby avoiding potentially costly litigation to seek such item.  

Since the requested information relates directly to [Client], we have determined that the information requested is not exempt under disclosure laws, is not a classified document, is not a protected internal communication, is not protected by “privacy,” and is not a “protected investigative record” within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act.  

We believe that your office has custody of the requested information, but if not, we hereby request prompt notice of the current location of such information.  To expedite this request,  we are willing to discuss specific instances of deletion or other exemption claims in advance of a final decision.  If any material is deemed to be exempt, we hereby request a detailed statement of the portion deleted or withheld, a full statement of the reasons for the refusal of access, and specific citations or statutory authority for the denial. 

This letter shall confirm that [Client] hereby agrees to pay for all reasonable search and copying costs that may be associated with this request. However, we would appreciate the opportunity to inspect these records before any documents are copied  If search and copying costs exceed $200, please telephone us in advance for an agreement as to such additional costs. 

The FOIA Response. Under the FOIA, the IRS is required to determine within 20 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) after the date of receipt of a request whether to comply with the request.[ii]  IRS can extend the 20 day period by an additional 10 days in unusual circumstances.[iii] These circumstances generally include the need to collect information from field locations, review large numbers of documents, and consultations with other agencies. [iv] If a request is denied in whole or in part, the IRS must state the reasons for the denial that there is a right to appeal any adverse determination to the Commissioner of the IRS or his designee.[v] 

A delay resulting from a predictable IRS workload is not an unusual circumstance. IRS may seek to limit the scope of the request or arrange an alternative time frame for processing the request. If the request is denied to any extent, the IRS is required to state the reasons for the denial.  If IRS fails to comply with the request within the applicable time limitations, any person making a request is deemed to have exhausted their administrative remedies with respect to the request and they may proceed to the filing of an action in Federal District Court. In practice, the IRS typically requests an additional 30 days within which to provide the requested information. It is often appropriate to grant  this request since the IRS usually provides the requested information within the additional time period and any appeal would likely exceed the additional time in any event. 

FOIA Exemptions. The IRS may withhold an IRS document that is specifically exempted or excluded by statute. The exemptions protect against the disclosure of information that would harm national security, the privacy of individuals, the proprietary interests of a business, the functioning of the government, and other important recognized interests. 

When a document contains some information that qualifies as exempt, the entire document is not necessarily exempt. Instead, the FOIA specifically requires that any reasonably segregable portions of a document must be provided after the deletion of the portions that are exempt. The IRS must  identify the location of deletions in the released portion of the document and, where technologically feasible, show the deletion at the place on the document where the deletion was made, unless including that indication would harm an interest protected by an exemption. 

Exemption 1 – Classified Documents Pertaining to National Defense and Foreign Policy.[vi] This exemption permits the withholding of matters specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and which are in fact properly classified under such executive order. IRS does not generally deal with these types of matters, thus this exemption is rarely used. 

Exemption 2 – Internal Personnel Rules and Practices.[vii] This exemption covers matters that are related to IRS’s internal personnel rules and practices. There are two separate classes of documents that are generally held to fall within this exemption: (a) The information relating to personnel rules or internal IRS practices may be exempt if it is a trivial administrative matter of no genuine public interest; and (b)  More substantial internal IRS matters, the disclosure of which would risk circumvention of a legal requirement. 

Exemption 3 – Information Exempt Under Other Laws.[viii] This exemption incorporates into the FOIA other laws that restrict the availability of information. To qualify, a statute must require that matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue or if the statute establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld. One example of a qualifying statute is Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) which governs the disclosure of tax returns and return information. By law, tax records may not be disclosed to any individual unless specifically authorized by IRC Section 6103. 

Exemption 4 – Trade Secrets and Confidential Commercial or Financial Information[ix]. This exemption protects from public disclosure both trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. A trade secret has been narrowly defined by the courts under the FOIA as a commercially valuable plan, formula, process, or device that is used for making, preparing, compounding or processing trade commodities and that can be said to be the end product of either innovation or substantial effort. The second type of protected data is privileged or confidential commercial or financial information obtained from a person. 

Exemption 5 – InterAgency or IntraAgency Memorandums or Letters.[x] This exemption applies to interagency or intraagency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency. An example may be a letter from one IRS office to another about a decision that has not yet been adopted. One purpose of this is to safeguard the deliberative policymaking process of government (the “deliberative process privilege”) which encourages open discussion of policy matters between IRS officials by allowing certain predecisional, deliberative documents to be withheld from public disclosure. It also protects against premature disclosure of deliberations before final adoption of an agency policy or position. 

This exemption protects the policymaking process, but it does not generally protect purely factual information related to the policy process that is protected under the deliberative process privilege. The deliberative process privilege distinguishes between documents that are predecisional and postdecisional. Once a policy is adopted, the public has a greater interest in knowing the basis for the decision. Therefore, the deliberative process privilege does not ordinarily apply to postdecisional documents. This exemption also incorporates other privileges that apply in litigation involving the government, including the attorney-client and work-product privileges. For example, certain documents prepared by IRS lawyers may be withheld in the same way that documents prepared by private lawyers for clients are not available through discovery in civil litigation. 

Exemption 6 – Personal Privacy.[xi] This exemption covers personnel, medical, and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. It protects the privacy interests of individuals by allowing IRS to withhold personal data kept in its files where there is an expectation of privacy. Only individuals have privacy interests. Corporations and business associations have no privacy rights under this exemption, with the exception of closely held corporations or similar business entities. 

Exemption 7 – Law Enforcement.[xii] This exemption allows agencies to withhold records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with ongoing enforcement proceedings, would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information may be exempt from disclosure, could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a confidential source (including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority, or a private institution that furnished information on a confidential basis),  would reveal techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions or that would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual. 

Exemption 8 – Financial Institutions.[xiii] This exemption protects information that is contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions (such as FDIC, the Federal Reserve, or similar agencies). 

Exemption 9 – Geological Information. The ninth FOIA exemption covers geological and geophysical information, data, and maps, concerning wells.[xiv] 

FOIA Exclusions. The FOIA also contains special protection provisions that expressly authorize federal law enforcement agencies to treat especially sensitive records under certain specified circumstances as not subject to the FOIA. IRS may not be required to even confirm the existence of these types of records. If requested, IRS may respond that there are no records responsive to the request.  However, these exclusions do not broaden the authority of the IRS to withhold documents from the public. The exclusions are only applicable to information that is otherwise exempt from disclosure. 

Exclusion 1 – This exclusion may be used when a request seeks information described in subsection (b)(7)(A) of the FOIA if the investigation in question must involve a possible violation of criminal law, there is reason to believe that the subject of the investigation is not already aware that the investigation is underway and disclosure of the existence of the records could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings. When each of these conditions exist, the IRS may respond to a FOIA request for investigatory records as if the records are not subject to the requirements of the FOIA. The IRS response does not have to reveal that it is conducting an investigation.

Exclusion 2 – This exclusion applies to informant records maintained by IRS criminal law enforcement filed under the informant’s name or personal identifier. IRS is not required to confirm the existence of these records unless the informant’s status has been officially confirmed. This exclusion is intended to protect the identity of confidential informants. 

Exclusion 3 – This exclusion is limited to to records maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation pertaining to foreign intelligence, counterintelligence, or international terrorism. When the existence of these types of records is classified, the FBI may treat the records as not subject to the requirements of FOIA.  

FOIA Administrative Appeal Procedures. Whenever a FOIA request is denied, the IRS must clearly state the reasons for the denial and state the right to appeal the denial. An appeal may be based upon  the withholding of a document, denial of a fee waiver request, the type or amount of fees charged, failure by the IRS to conduct an adequate search for the requested documents or any other type of adverse FOIA determination.[xv] However, an appeal may not be filed for the lack of a timely response. If a request is granted in part and denied in part, the appeal would solely relate to the part that was denied.  If IRS has agreed to disclose some but not all requested documents, the filing of an appeal does not affect the release of the documents that are otherwise disclosable. A FOIA appeal is an administrative appeal. The procedural requirements for filing an appeal are found at. There is no charge for filing an administrative appeal. 

The appeal should include reasons why the IRS response to the FOIA was inadequate and must be postmarked within 35 days after the date of the letter of denial or the date of other adverse determinations.[xvi] An administrative appeal for denial of a request for expedited processing must be made by letter postmarked within 10 days after the date of the response letter denying expedited processing.[xvii] An appeal is filed by sending a letter to IRS Appeals, Attn: FOIA Appeals, 5045 E. Butler Avenue, M/Stop 55201, Fresno, California 93727-5136. The appeal should include copies of the FOIA request and the initial IRS decision responding to the request. The envelope containing the appeal should be marked in the lower lefthand corner with the words “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.” When a FOIA request is filed, the IRS assigns it a number which should be set forth in the appeal. 

IRS is required to make a decision on an appeal within 20 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) after the date of receipt of the appeal unless extended.[xviii] It is possible for the IRS to extend the time limits by an additional 10 days under unusual circumstances.[xix] If the IRS fails to comply with the time limitations, the FOIA requester shall be deemed to have exhausted administrative remedies and may proceed with a judicial appeal in a Federal District Court.[xx] 

Judicial Action. If an administrative appeal is denied, a complaint against the IRS may be filed to a federal district court seeking disclosure of the requested information.[xxi]  The complaint must be served upon the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Attention: CC:PA, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. Attorneys fees and litigation costs reasonably incurred may be awarded if the requestor substantially prevails in litigation. 

Summary.  The FOIA request represents an important component of every practitioners procedural toolbox when pursuing the administrative appeal following an examination. The information received will almost always justify the limited effort required to submit a FOIA request. Sometimes it might be a key document or some comment within the agents narrative statement. At other times, it might simply represent affirmation of the lack of adverse information within the government administrative file. If not requested, the information will not be forthcoming. If requested…the responsive information may be the key to a favorable resolution!

 

 

301318.1

 

 

 


[i].          5 U.S.C. § 552

[ii].          5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(A)(i).

[iii].         5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(B)(i)-(iii) and Treasury Regulation 601.702 (c)(11)(i)(A)(1)-(4)

[iv].         5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(B)(i).

[v].         5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(6)(A)(i)

[vi].         5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(1).

[vii].        5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(2).

[viii].       5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(3).

[ix].         5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(4).

[x].         5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(5).

[xi].         5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(6).

[xii].        5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(7).

 

[xiii].       5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(8).

[xiv].       5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(7)(B)(9).

[xv].            Treasury Regulation 601.702 (c)(10)

[xvi].            Treasury Regulation 601.702 (c)(10)

[xvii].            Treasury Regulation 601.702 (c)(10)

[xviii].            Treasury Regulation 601.702(c)(10)(iii).

[xix].            Treasury Regulation 601.702( c)(11)(i)

[xx].            Treasury Regulation 601.702( c)(12)

[xxi].       5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B); Treasury Regulation 601.702(c)(13)

The IRS Large Business and International Division (LB&I), formerly known as the Large & Mid-Sized Business Division, recently formed a new Industry Group known as the Global High-Wealth Industry Group, commonly referred to as the “Wealth Squad.” The purpose of the Wealth Squad is to bring together an IRS team of specialists to coordinate the compliance review and, if necessary, detailed examination of complex returns of high wealth individuals and their related entities.

The stovepipe fashion of historical IRS examinations, by design, missed various compliance issues lurking within layers upon layers of related limited liability companies, partnerships, trusts, private foundations, etc. Based on their professional experience and training, examiners reviewed sufficient documents/information to determine the accuracy of the taxpayer’s return. The amount of documents/information to be reviewed and the depth of the examination has been a matter of professional judgment based on the information developed – or not – during the examination. The Wealth Squad is now coordinating examiners and related specialists in an effort to unwind the complex legal structures behind sophisticated domestic and foreign business and investment arrangements. Similar examination groups are employed by tax authorities in Japan, Germany, the UK, Canada, Australia and elsewhere. 

LB&I Industry Groups. LB&I serves corporations, S corporations, partnerships and other pass-through entities having more than $10 million in assets. These entities typically have large numbers of employees, deal with complicated issues involving tax law and accounting principles, and conduct their operations in an expanding global environment. LB&I operates within various Industry Groups which include Communications, Technology, and Media; Financial Services; Heavy Manufacturing and Transportation; Natural Resources and Construction; Retailers, Food, Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare; and the Global High Wealth Industry. Additionally, LB&I maintains a Field Specialists examination support function that includes Computer Audit Specialists, Employment Tax Specialists, Economists, Engineers, and Financial Products and Transactions Specialists. 

Communications, Technology, and Media Industry Group – headquartered in Oakland, California serves taxpayers involved in computer production, media (including communication and software), sports franchises, and recreational firms covering approximately 15,300 taxpayers (comprised of 1,100 large businesses and 14,200 mid-size businesses). 

Financial Services – headquartered in New York City, serves more than 43,000 taxpayers involved in commercial and foreign banking, securities, insurance companies, investment bankers, mutual funds, law and accounting firms, and other financial intermediaries.  Financial Services is also responsible for the US withholding agent and qualified intermediary programs, and has leadership and oversight for the technical tax shelter promoter program. 

Heavy Manufacturing and Transportation – headquartered in Iselin, New Jersey, serves approximately 58,750 taxpayers (comprised of 200 large businesses and 58,550 mid-size businesses) involved in air transportation, railroads, aerospace, motor vehicles, trucking, shipping, and real estate. 

Natural Resources and Construction – headquartered in Houston, Texas, provides end-to-end tax administration services to over 17,000 large and mid-size businesses nationwide that are engaged in the oil and gas, mining, utilities, forestry, chemical, waste management, and construction industries. 

Retailers, Food, Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare – headquartered in Downers Grove, Illinois, serves approximately 18,300 taxpayers (consisting of approximately 300 large businesses and 18,000 mid-size businesses) related to food and beverage, retailing, pharmaceuticals, agricultural commodities, farms, and healthcare. 

Global High Wealth – headquartered with LB&I in Washington, D.C., conducts tax compliance reviews of high wealth individuals and the networks of enterprises and entities they control. 

The Wealth Squad. In announcing the creation of the Global High-Wealth Industry Group, IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman stated “For a variety of reasons – including valid business reasons – many high wealth individuals make use of sophisticated financial, business, and investment arrangements with complicated legal structures and tax consequences. Many of these arrangements are entirely above board. Others mask aggressive tax strategies.” [i] As recently stated by the Eleventh Circuit,  “It is no surprise that a knowledgeable tax attorney would use numerous legal entities to accomplish different objectives. This does not make them illegitimate. Unfortunately such ‘maneuvering’ is apparently encouraged by our present tax laws and codes.” [ii] Tax planning is anything but sinister; it is why sophisticated, well-intentioned practitioners spend countless hours of their personal time educating and re-educating themselves on the ever-changing interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code found within the minds of Members of Congress and the judiciary. 

Wealthy taxpayers often engage teams of sophisticated tax, business and estate planning lawyers, accountants and other professional advisors to legitimately minimize their potential tax liabilities. A well-designed business and estate plan may include some or all of  various domestic and foreign business entities such as limited liability companies, S corporations, revocable and irrevocable trusts, real estate investments and private foundations. The plan may also include revenue-based or equity sharing arrangements together with royalty and licensing agreements and retirement plans. In this world of specialization, few private practitioners have the expertise to be specialists with respect to developing a comprehensive plan encompassing every potential tax, business, estate and gift related issue. 

Although there are many sophisticated IRS representatives, few could realistically expect to unravel the intricacies of a well-designed business and estate plan employing multiple domestic and foreign entities and investment arrangements. The Wealth Squad is designed to allow the IRS to better understand the sophisticated financial, business and investment arrangements of the taxpayer by engaging a team of specialists to take a unified, holistic look at the entire web of inter-related entities controlled by a high wealth individual to discover the entire economic picture of the enterprise and to assess the tax compliance of that overall enterprise. 

The initial examination focus has been on individuals with tens of millions of dollars in assets or income. Following a review of the initial examinations, the selection criteria will likely evolve to take into account information obtained in the examinations as well as to utilize the expertise of the expanding group of Wealth Squad specialists which will include flow-through specialists, international examiners, economists to identify economic trends, appraisal experts to advise on valuation issues, and technical advisors to provide industry or specialized tax expertise. It will draw upon resources throughout the IRS including the Tax Exempt and Government Entities (TE/GE) Division, the Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) Division, and numerous international information exchange agreements. In egregious situations, it will likely be making referrals of taxpayers and/or their advisors to Criminal Investigation. 

Information Gathering. The IRS has the general authority to gather evidence and request information during the course of an examination.[iii] IRS requests are initially in the form of an Information Document Request – Form 4564 (IDR) – which must be reasonably designed to obtain information and documents relevant to a legitimate examination purpose. IDRs are to be specific, clear and concise.[iv] If the taxpayer fails to appropriately respond to an IDR, the IRS may issue a Summons. The IRS has broad authority to summons books and records, the taxpayer, or any person having custody of records in order to ascertain the correctness of the taxpayer’s return, to make a return, or to determine the liability of a taxpayer.[v] 

The Summons will set forth the date, time and place, where the summoned party is to appear, although at least ten (10) days’ prior notice of appearance is required.[vi] Compliance with the Summons may take the form of a formal question-and-answer session under oath, an informal interview, or the submission of (or providing access to) the records being summoned. The witness summoned is entitled to decline to produce documents or to answer particular questions if a good-faith basis exists for an objection to compliance. 

Neither an IDR nor a Summons are self-enforcing. If a taxpayer fails to reasonably comply with a Summons, the IRS may proceed with Summons enforcement. Jurisdiction to enforce a Summons is in the United States District Court for the District in which the summoned person resides.[vii]  In such event the IRS must demonstrate that: (1) the investigation is being conducted pursuant to a legitimate purpose; (2) the inquiry is relevant to that purpose; (3) the information sought is not within the possession of the IRS; and (4) the IRS has followed the administrative steps required by the Internal Revenue Code.[viii] A District Court Judge has the power to imprison anyone required to respond to a Summons. Typically, if the IRS proceeds to issue a Summons, it intends to enforce compliance with the Summons through a District Court proceeding, if necessary.

In addition to the issuance of an IDR (or Summons), other audit techniques used to gather information during a typical examination include: 

Interviews – interviews of the taxpayer and their advisors are designed to obtain leads, develop information, and establish evidence about the taxpayer’s financial history, business operations, and books and records[ix]

Tour of the Business Operations  – tours are designed to acquire an overview of the business operation, establish that the books and records accurately reflect actual business operations, observe and test internal controls, and identify potential audit issues [x];

Internal Controls – an evaluation of the taxpayer’s internal controls is performed to determine the reliability of the books and records, determine the appropriate audit techniques to be used during the examination, an opportunity to identify high risk accounts and eliminate verification of accounts that have little or no tax consequence, determine the scope and depth of the examination and the extent of audit procedures to be used, and assess the level of control risk [xi]

Examining the Books and Records – a review of the books and records is performed to determine the flow of transactions, method of accounting, etc.[xii]

Analyzing Schedules M-1, M-2, M-3 – a review of Schedule M-1 or M-3 is important to identify potential tax issues resulting from both temporary and permanent differences between financial and tax accounting[xiii]

Balance Sheet Analyses – the balance sheets and financial statements often reveal significant differences between tax years, timing differences between tax and book accounting, and a reconciliation with any Schedule M-1 or M-3 adjustments[xiv]

Testing Gross Receipts or Sales – a review of gross receipts or sales is performed to determine taxable income which may not readily appear as income on the taxpayer’s books due to differing accounting methods, timing of recognition, deferred income, constructive receipts, foreign source income, and related foreign transactions, etc.[xv]

Testing Expenses: Cost of Goods Sold – expense testing often entails a review of the beginning and ending inventories, compliance with the absorption rules in the regulations for Code § § 263A and 471, and variance accounts when standard costing is use[xvi]

Testing Expenses: Operational Expenses – operational expenses are reviewed to determine those which are significant, unusual, or questionable to better understand the taxpayer’s accounting methods and their application to timing and economic performance, expense versus capitalization, tax shelter write-offs, contingent liability accruals, material write-offs for tax and not for books, net operating loss carryforward and carryback, etc.[xvii]

Wealth Squad IDRs. The initial IDR issued in connection with the commencement of a Wealth Squad examination will seem overwhelming to even the most seasoned tax practitioners. The IRS has somewhat standardized their IDR in these matters by requesting everything imaginable with respect to the taxpayer under examination and all related entities. For the year under examination, the Wealth Squad IDR requests that the taxpayer: 

1.         Provide copies of all original and amended returns for the year under examination, the prior year and the current year if filed or when filed.

2.         Reconcile all adjustments to all original and amended returns and explain each adjustment.

3.         Identify all sources of your income, including who paid it and how it was paid.

4.         Identify all of your assets, tangible or intangible, owned directly or indirectly, inside and outside the U.S.

5.         Identify all liabilities owed, directly or indirectly, by you or any entity you controlled, inside and outside the U.S.

6.         Indicate any properties that you directly or indirectly leased or rented.

7.         Provide the full name, TIN, classification for U.S. tax purposes (e.g., C corporation, S corporation, disregarded entity, or trust), your position title and describe your responsibilities for or relationship with and U.S. or foreign entity of which you:

a.         Owned at least a 20%, direct or indirect, capital interest, including hybrid instruments convertible to 20% or more capital ownership;

b.         Had a 20% or more interest in profits/losses;

c.         Were a trustee or acted in a fiduciary capacity;

d.         Were a grantor or beneficiary;

e.         Had a nominee acting in your capacity or on your behalf;

f.          Were on the Board of Directors;

g.         Were an Officer or had signatory authority over funds and accounts controlled by the entity;

h.         Were a surety for or guaranteed debt or other liabilities.

8.         For any entity referenced above, from the inception of the entity to the present, provide:

a.         Identification of each and every current and former officer, trustee, and manager;

b.         Minutes, resolutions and records regarding the appointment, resignation or termination of all officers, trustees, and managers;

c.         Records regarding all assets transferred into or from the entity;

d.         Records regarding the ownership of all certificates of beneficial interest;

e.         A statement explaining the purpose for operating the business activity inside this type of entity together with the reason this entity was created, tax benefits explained to you regarding the operation of the business activity within this type of entity; who assisted you in forming the entity; fees charged with respect to the formation of the entity;

f.          Bank statements, deposit slips, debit/credit memos, and cancelled checks for all financial accounts, U.S. and foreign;

g.         Records to establish the basis of all assets held by the entity including invoices, purchase agreements, and the names and addresses of persons who transferred property to the entity;

h.         Records for sales or other transfers from the entity;

i.          Copies of any contracts for business services to be rendered by the entity.

9.         Provide complete copies of all financial statements and method of accounting used to compile them, net worth computations, or other financial data probative of your assets, liabilities, net worth, income and losses, and cash flows form all sources, within and without the U.S., including all underlying documents and any exhibits associated therewith, and if not apparent, please identify the preparer of such documents.

10.       Identify all assets transferred and/or sold to your children or other relatives.

11.       Identify all assets transferred or sold to a charitable organization or foundation and provide TIN and legal name of entity and describe your role or position with such entity.

12.       Provide complete copies of the tax preparation workpapers, including adjusting trial balances, tax mappings, and closing adjustments used to prepare your return.

13.       Identify any asset transferred and/or sold utilizing estate planning to reduce potential estate tax obligations, including Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs), Living Trust Agreements, Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), Private Foundations (PFs), Community Foundations (CFs), Donor Advised Funds (DAFs), Qualified Personal Residence Trusts (QPRTs), Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRATs) and/or Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts (IDGTs).

14.       Provide complete copies of any audited financial statements, including applicable exhibits and/or footnotes, for any entity referenced above.

12.       Provide copies of all organizational charts (including all tax organizational charts) of any related entity or for any entity referenced above.

13.       For any partnership referenced above,

a.         Provide copies of all organizational documents, including but not limited to, the partnership agreements, and all amendments, modifications, supplemental agreements, operating agreements, by-laws, side letters, and side pocket agreements.

b.         Describe all of your reasons and/or objectives for entering into the partnership.

c.         Describe the business/ investment model for the partnership’s activities.

d.         Describe the background pertaining to the formation of the partnership.

14.       Provide copies of all tax opinions received impacting any return under examination.

15.       Detail any fees you paid with regard to tax or estate planning including the amount paid, provider who received the fee, description of the planning that was done for the fee, whether a confidentiality agreement was signed, and copies of any marketing materials received with regard to the planning.

16.       Indicate whether you had an interest or signatory authority over a foreign financial account with assets in excess of $10,000 and provide copies of FBARs.

17.       Provide a copy of the annual brokerage account statement for each brokerage account you held.

18.            Describe any securities lending agreements you entered, exited, or were engaged in and provide a copy.

19.       Provide copies of all information filed for any disclosures to the IRS regarding any offshore or cross-border transactions and/or accounts. If no disclosures were required, provide an affirmative statement to that effect and the reason that no disclosure was required.

20.            Describe any offshore or cross-border financial transaction you treated differently for tax purposes in the U.S. than you treated in a foreign taxing jurisdiction.

21.       For any assets (tangible or intangible) you sold or transferred from the U.S. to any foreign person or entity or vice versa, indicate each asset sold or transferred, the value at the time of sale or transfer, and describe how the value was determined. Provide copies of any appraisal or reports received that indicate how the value was determined.

22.       For each of the following investments held directly or indirectly, describe the investment, the name of the financial institution and account where the investment was held and provide copies of all documents received regarding the investment:

a.         Financial derivatives;

b.         Notional principal contracts, swaps, swaptions;

c.         Prepaid forward contracts;

Hedge funds;

d.         Private equity funds;

e.         Foreign partnerships, foreign limited liability companies, foreign corporations or other foreign entities;

f.          Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs);

g.         Real estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (REMICs);

h.         Financial Asset Securitization Trusts (FASITs);

i.          Other collateralized debt obligations (CDOs, including any pay-through bonds);

j.          U.S. or Foreign distressed assets or non-performing loans;

k.         Securities reported as worthless;

l.          Debt reported as a loss on your return;

m.        Gains or losses from foreign currency;

n.         IRC §1256 contracts;

o.         Debt instruments with OID.

23.       For each hedge fund or private equity fund investment identified above,

a.         Provide Schedules K-1 received from each investment;

b.         Provide the name and TIN for each entity in which you were a general partner, managing partner or Tax Matters Partner;

c.         If a party to a deferred compensation arrangement with such an entity, provide a copy of the deferred compensation agreement;

d.         Provide the name and TIN for each foreign hedge fund in which you owned an interest directly, indirectly or through a nominee. 

Detailed responses to detailed requests for information often generate additional detailed requests for information. As such, Wealth Squad IDRs typically conclude with the admonition that additional information or records may be requested in order to complete the examination. Further, taxpayer’s are cautioned to retain all potentially relevant and previously requested records or documents until the examination is concluded. 

Practitioners specializing in transactional and wealth transfer (estate, gift and charitable planning, etc.) matters should carefully review the foregoing list of information requested in a Wealth Squad examination. There is no better time to prepare for a later examination than when the documents are being drafted and executed. Files for relevant documents and schedules should be coordinated with a view towards accelerating any later examination. If the transaction has any unique concerns, those issues should be well documented. It is sometimes difficult to later recall why documents were drafted in a certain manner or with unique provisions. 

Resolution of Wealth Squad Examinations. Near the commencement of the Wealth Squad examination, the taxpayer will be requested to sign an audit plan that will set forth audit mutual audit expectations, timeframes, responsiveness, etc. The IRS may require responses within a relatively short timeframe. If the practitioner believes they may be unable to satisfy the projected time schedule for responses, that fact should be raised before execution of the audit plan. Do not sign on for something that may later turn against you in the examination process. If documents are not readily available, make that fact known in advance. 

 They are likely to also receive the standardized IDR that may cause the practitioner to wonder about their ability to effectively respond as well as their ethical responsibilities. Upon request by the IRS, practitioners must promptly submit non-privileged records & information to the IRS, notify the IRS of the location of requested records & information in possession of others, and make reasonable inquiries of the taxpayer regarding the location of requested records & information in possession of others.[xviii] Further, a practitioner may not unreasonably delay the prompt disposition of any matter before the IRS. [xix] 

How can any practitioner promptly and effectively respond to an IDR that requests everything imaginable with respect to the investment and business activities of a typical high wealth taxpayer having numerous domestic and foreign related entities? The initial thought of most practitioners is that such IDRs are overbroad and essentially penalize the taxpayer for being wealthy through the required expenditure of significant of accounting and legal fees in order to respond appropriately. Initially, the practitioner should coordinate a meeting with the Wealth Squad examination team to determine whether it might be possible to streamline the examination process. Provide an overview of the taxpayer’s business operations, internal controls and review procedures, etc. Neither the taxpayer nor the IRS have any desire to unnecessarily prolong the audit process. However, the IRS often has little, if any, information initially available to help it determine whether the returns, as filed, were substantially accurate. That is the purpose of the examination. 

The practitioner’s duty of representation to the client must be balanced with the effort to reasonably cooperate with the examination process. The practitioner should attempt to reasonably limit the scope of the inquiry and limit the information provided so as to avoid the waiver of any potential privileges. If matters are privileged, the correspondence and relevant files should be appropriately labeled. Be aware of any potential privileges that may apply and make sure not to inadvertently waive any privilege. Separate files should be maintained for relevant documents that might be requested by the IRS as well as documents that contain potentially confidential, privileged information. It is important to know exactly which documents are deemed important to the IRS. Copies of documents provided during the course of the examination should be made in duplicate – one copy for the IRS and an extra copy to be maintained in a separate audit file specifically identifying documents provided during the course of the audit. 

It is generally advisable to attempt to resolve any examination at the earliest opportunity. However, the design of Wealth Squad examinations mostly precludes any ability for a prompt resolution. Practitioners must respect the nature of these examinations and exercise discretion and their best judgment in responding to each request for information. The IRS has determined that high wealth taxpayers represent a compliance challenge worthy of devoting substantial enforcement resources to the creation, funding and operation of the Wealth Squad. Taxpayers and their representatives must be prepared to respond in kind. We are not in Kansas anymore….


[i].            Remarks of Douglas H. Shulman, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, before the AICPA National Conference on Federal Taxation, October 26, 2010, Washington, D.C.

[ii].          Ballard v. Commissioner 522 F. 3rd 1229 (11th Circuit, April 7, 2008)

[iii].         Internal Revenue Code § 7602, et. seq.

 

[iv].         IRM 4.46.4.4.1  (03-01-2006).

[v].         Internal Revenue Code §7602, et. seq.; See also United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964).

[vi].         Internal Revenue Code §7605.

[vii].        Internal Revenue Code §7604.

[viii].       United States v. Powell,  379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964).

[ix].         Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) 4.10.3.2 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.1 (03-01-2006).

[x].         IRM 4.10.3.3 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.2 (03-01-2006)

[xi].            “Control risk ” is defined as the risk that a material misstatement could occur and it will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the business’s internal control structure, policies or procedures. IRM 4.10.3.4 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.3 (03-01-2006)

[xii].        IRM 4.10.3.5 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.3 (03-01-2006)

[xiii].       IRM 4.10.3.6 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.2.5 (03-01-2006)

[xiv].       IRM 4.10.3.8 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.6 (03-01-2006)

[xv].        IRM 4.10.3.9 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.7 (03-01-2006)

[xvi].       IRM 4.10.3.10 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.8 (03-01-2006)

[xvii].      IRM 4.10.3.11 (03-01-2003) and 4.46.4.2.9 (03-01-2006)

[xviii].            Treasury Department Circular No. 230 (CIR 230), Regulations Governing the Practice of Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents, Enrolled Actuaries, Enrolled Retirement Plan Agents, and Appraisers before the Internal Revenue Service,  §10.20

[xix].       CIR 230 §10.23

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.